Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26165698›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Ultra-high-resolution 3D imaging of atherosclerosis in mice with synchrotron differential phase contrast: a proof of concept study.

Gabriele Bonanno, Simone Coppo, Peter Modregger, Maxime Pellegrin, Annina Stuber, Marco Stampanoni, Lucia Mazzolai, Matthias Stuber, Ruud B van Heeswijk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Advances in CT Techniques in Vascular Calcification.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Validation of diffusion tensor MRI measurements of cardiac microstructure with structure tensor synchrotron radiation imaging.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Gabriele Bonanno1] Department of Radiology, University Hospital (CHUV) and University (UNIL) of Lausanne, Switzerland [2] Center for Biomedical Imaging (CIBM), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Simone Coppo1] Department of Radiology, University Hospital (CHUV) and University (UNIL) of Lausanne, Switzerland [2] Center for Biomedical Imaging (CIBM), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Peter Modregger1] Center for Biomedical Imaging (CIBM), Lausanne, Switzerland [2] Swiss Light Source, Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, Switzerland.
Maxime PellegrinDivision of Angiology, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), Switzerland.
Annina Stuber1] Department of Radiology, University Hospital (CHUV) and University (UNIL) of Lausanne, Switzerland [2] Center for Biomedical Imaging (CIBM), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Marco Stampanoni1] Swiss Light Source, Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, Switzerland [2] Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University and ETH Zürich, Zürich.
Lucia MazzolaiDivision of Angiology, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), Switzerland.
Matthias Stuber1] Department of Radiology, University Hospital (CHUV) and University (UNIL) of Lausanne, Switzerland [2] Center for Biomedical Imaging (CIBM), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Ruud B van Heeswijk1] Department of Radiology, University Hospital (CHUV) and University (UNIL) of Lausanne, Switzerland [2] Center for Biomedical Imaging (CIBM), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Centre d'Imagerie BioMedicale · CHUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CHUniversity of Lausanne · CHSwiss Light Source

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of this study was to investigate the performance of 3D synchrotron differential phase contrast (DPC) imaging for the visualization of both macroscopic and microscopic aspects of atherosclerosis in the mouse vasculature ex vivo. The hearts and aortas of 2 atherosclerotic and 2 wild-type control mice were scanned with DPC imaging with an isotropic resolution of 15 μm. The coronary artery vessel walls were segmented in the DPC datasets to assess their thickness, and histological staining was performed at the level of atherosclerotic plaques. The DPC imaging allowed for the visualization of complex structures such as the coronary arteries and their branches, the thin fibrous cap of atherosclerotic plaques as well as the chordae tendineae. The coronary vessel wall thickness ranged from 37.4 ± 5.6 μm in proximal coronary arteries to 13.6 ± 3.3 μm in distal branches. No consistent differences in coronary vessel wall thickness were detected between the wild-type and atherosclerotic hearts in this proof-of-concept study, although the standard deviation in the atherosclerotic mice was higher in most segments, consistent with the observation of occasional focal vessel wall thickening. Overall, DPC imaging of the cardiovascular system of the mice allowed for a simultaneous detailed 3D morphological assessment of both large structures and microscopic details.

Indexed as

AnimalsApolipoproteins EAtherosclerosisCoronary VesselsFeasibility StudiesHeartImaging, Three-DimensionalMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutRadiographySignal-To-Noise RatioSynchrotronsApolipoproteins E

Identifiers

PMID26165698
PMCPMC4499839
OpenAlexW2265950608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.