Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26164652›Full record

ReviewBMC public health2015

Understanding the complex interplay of barriers to physical activity amongst black and minority ethnic groups in the United Kingdom: a qualitative synthesis using meta-ethnography.

Sejlo A Koshoedo, Virginia A Paul-Ebhohimhen, Ruth G Jepson, Margaret C Watson

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Behind the Screen: An Exploratory Study of Factors Influencing Breast Screening Uptake in Lancashire (UK).Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sejlo A KoshoedoCentre of Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen Polwarth Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK. sejlo.koshoedo@nhs.net.
Virginia A Paul-EbhohimhenNHS Highlands Occupational Health Service Osprey House, Raigmore Avenue, Inverness, IV2 3DZ, UK. vpaul-ebhohimhen@nhs.net.
Ruth G JepsonScottish Collaboration for Public Health Research and Policy (SCPHRP), University of Edinburgh, 20 West Richmond Street, Edinburgh, EH8 9DX, UK. ruth.jepson@ed.ac.uk.
Margaret C WatsonCentre of Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen Polwarth Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK. m.c.watson@abdn.ac.uk.
University of Aberdeen · GBNHS Highland · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office HSRU2Medical Research Council MR/K023209/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo conduct a meta-ethnographic analysis of qualitative studies to identify barriers to Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) individuals engaging in physical activity in the UK context.

methodsA qualitative synthesis using meta-ethnographic methods to synthesis studies of barriers to engaging in physical activity among BME groups in the UK. A comprehensive search strategy of multiple databases was employed to identify qualitative research studies published up to October 2012. The eleven searched databases included ASSIA, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Health Technology Assessment (HTA), NHS Scotland Library, Physical Activity Health Alliance (PAHA), PsyINFO, Social Services Abstract, Sport discuss and Web of Science. The Noblit and Hare's meta-ethnographic approach was undertaken to develop an inductive and interpretive form of knowledge synthesis.

resultsFourteen papers met the inclusion criteria. The synthesis indicated that barriers to physical activity among BME individuals were influenced by four main concepts: perceptions; cultural expectations; personal barriers; and factors limiting access to facilities. BME individuals had different understandings of physical activity were influenced by migration history, experiences, cultural and health beliefs. This in turn may have a disempowering effect on BME individuals in terms of adopting or maintaining physical activity. These barriers to physical activity were explained at a higher conceptual level by a socio-ecological model. The social construct 'individual perception and understanding of physical activity' was particularly relevant to theoretical models and interventions.

conclusionInterventions to promote engagement with physical activity need to address perceptions of this behaviour. The elicited concepts and contexts could be used to enhance the development of tailored effective health promotion interventions for BME individuals.

Indexed as

EthnicityExerciseMinority GroupsAnthropology, CulturalBlack PeopleCultureHealth BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PromotionHumansQualitative ResearchUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID26164652
PMCPMC4499183
OpenAlexW1846178882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.