ArticlePediatric radiology2015
Clinical significance of pulmonary nodules detected on abdominal CT in pediatric patients.
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Natural history and clinical characteristics of pulmonary subsolid nodules in pediatric patients: a cohort study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Pediatric lung ground glass nodules: a real-world, large-scale CT cohort analysis.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Pediatric pulmonary nodules: current state of knowledge, AI applications, and future directions.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Imaging features and clinical evaluation of pulmonary nodules in children.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Solitary pulmonary nodule in an early adolescent.BMJ case reports · 2023Article
- The incidental pulmonary nodule in a child. Part 2: Commentary and suggestions for clinical management, risk communication and prevention.Pediatric radiology · 2015Review
- The incidental pulmonary nodule in a child. Part 1: recommendations from the SPR Thoracic Imaging Committee regarding characterization, significance and follow-up.Pediatric radiology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe clinical significance of a pulmonary nodule that is detected incidentally on CT studies in children is unknown. In addition, there is limited information regarding the management of incidentally detected pulmonary nodules discovered on abdominal CT studies in children.
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical significance of incidental pulmonary nodules detected on abdominal CT studies in children. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis was a retrospective study performed following institutional review board approval. Abdominal CT reports in patients younger than 18 years of age from July 2004 to June 2011 were reviewed for the terms "nodule," "nodular" or "mass" in reference to the lung bases. The study population included those pediatric patients in whom pulmonary nodules were initially detected on abdominal CT studies. The largest pulmonary nodules detected on CT studies were evaluated for their features (size, shape, margin, attenuation, location, and presence of calcification and cavitation). Follow-up CT studies and clinical records were reviewed for demographic information, history of underlying malignancies and the clinical outcome of the incidental pulmonary nodules. Comparison of malignant versus benign pulmonary nodules was performed with respect to the size of the nodule, imaging features on CT, and patient history of malignancy using the Student's t-test and Fisher exact test. Youden J-index in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the optimal cut-off size for suggesting a high risk of malignancy of incidentally detected pulmonary nodules.
resultsPulmonary nodules meeting inclusion criteria were detected in 62 (1.2%) of 5,234 patients. The mean age of patients with nodules was 11.2 years (range: 5 months-18 years). Thirty-one patients (50%) had follow-up CT studies and two of these patients (6%) were subsequently found to have malignant pulmonary nodules. Both of these patients had a history of malignancy. Of the remaining 31 patients without follow-up CT studies, none had a history of malignancy. Clinical follow-up data was available in 26 of these 31 patients (84%) and none had any evidence of malignant pulmonary nodule development. There was a significant association between history of malignancy and incidentally detected pulmonary nodules on abdominal CT studies subsequently found to be malignant (P = 0.036). The size was significantly larger for the malignant pulmonary nodules compared to the benign pulmonary nodules with a size ≥7 mm in diameter being the optimal cut-off for suggesting a high risk of malignancy (11.5 ± 6.4 mm vs. 4.7 ± 3.0 mm, P = 0.003).
conclusionThe incidence of pulmonary nodules found on pediatric abdominal CT studies is 1.2%. The incidence of malignancy in such pulmonary nodules is low (3%) and only seen in the setting of pulmonary nodules ≥7 mm in diameter in children with a history of malignancy. Therefore, further investigation is warranted for pulmonary nodules that are ≥7 mm in children with a history of malignancy while further imaging work-up may not be necessary in the remaining patients in this pediatric patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26164441What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.