Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26164441›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2015

Clinical significance of pulmonary nodules detected on abdominal CT in pediatric patients.

Micheál Breen, David Zurakowski, Edward Y Lee

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Micheál BreenDepartment of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA, 02115, USA. micheal.breen@childrens.harvard.edu.
David ZurakowskiDepartments of Anesthesiology and Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Edward Y LeeDepartment of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA, 02115, USA. edward.lee@childrens.harvard.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe clinical significance of a pulmonary nodule that is detected incidentally on CT studies in children is unknown. In addition, there is limited information regarding the management of incidentally detected pulmonary nodules discovered on abdominal CT studies in children.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical significance of incidental pulmonary nodules detected on abdominal CT studies in children. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis was a retrospective study performed following institutional review board approval. Abdominal CT reports in patients younger than 18 years of age from July 2004 to June 2011 were reviewed for the terms "nodule," "nodular" or "mass" in reference to the lung bases. The study population included those pediatric patients in whom pulmonary nodules were initially detected on abdominal CT studies. The largest pulmonary nodules detected on CT studies were evaluated for their features (size, shape, margin, attenuation, location, and presence of calcification and cavitation). Follow-up CT studies and clinical records were reviewed for demographic information, history of underlying malignancies and the clinical outcome of the incidental pulmonary nodules. Comparison of malignant versus benign pulmonary nodules was performed with respect to the size of the nodule, imaging features on CT, and patient history of malignancy using the Student's t-test and Fisher exact test. Youden J-index in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the optimal cut-off size for suggesting a high risk of malignancy of incidentally detected pulmonary nodules.

resultsPulmonary nodules meeting inclusion criteria were detected in 62 (1.2%) of 5,234 patients. The mean age of patients with nodules was 11.2 years (range: 5 months-18 years). Thirty-one patients (50%) had follow-up CT studies and two of these patients (6%) were subsequently found to have malignant pulmonary nodules. Both of these patients had a history of malignancy. Of the remaining 31 patients without follow-up CT studies, none had a history of malignancy. Clinical follow-up data was available in 26 of these 31 patients (84%) and none had any evidence of malignant pulmonary nodule development. There was a significant association between history of malignancy and incidentally detected pulmonary nodules on abdominal CT studies subsequently found to be malignant (P = 0.036). The size was significantly larger for the malignant pulmonary nodules compared to the benign pulmonary nodules with a size ≥7 mm in diameter being the optimal cut-off for suggesting a high risk of malignancy (11.5 ± 6.4 mm vs. 4.7 ± 3.0 mm, P = 0.003).

conclusionThe incidence of pulmonary nodules found on pediatric abdominal CT studies is 1.2%. The incidence of malignancy in such pulmonary nodules is low (3%) and only seen in the setting of pulmonary nodules ≥7 mm in diameter in children with a history of malignancy. Therefore, further investigation is warranted for pulmonary nodules that are ≥7 mm in children with a history of malignancy while further imaging work-up may not be necessary in the remaining patients in this pediatric patient population.

Indexed as

Radiography, AbdominalTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantLungLung NeoplasmsMaleReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSolitary Pulmonary NoduleAbdomenChildrenComputed tomographyIncidental findingsLungPulmonary nodules

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.