ArticleJournal of cardiac failure2015
Intra-Aortic Balloon Counterpulsation in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Cardiogenic Shock: Clinical Response and Predictors of Stabilization.
Article in Journal of cardiac failure, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evolving Evidence-Driven Strategies in Cardiogenic Shock Management.JACC. Advances · 2026Review
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of axillary intra-aortic balloon pump as a bridge to advanced heart failure therapy.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Case Report: Intra-aortic balloon pump in a patient with refractory cardiogenic shock complicating severe aortic stenosis-enhanced hemodynamic response with low aortic compliance.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- The Intra-aortic Balloon Pump: A Focused Review of Physiology, Transport Logistics, Mechanics, and Complications.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2024Review
- Contemporary Evidence and Practice on Right Heart Catheterization in Patients with Acute or Chronic Heart Failure.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Review of Pathophysiology of Cardiogenic Shock and Escalation of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices.Current cardiology reports · 2023Review
- Impact of end stage renal disease on the clinical outcomes of diabetics admitted for heart failure: Analysis of national inpatient sample.Journal of cardiovascular and thoracic research · 2023Article
- Intra-aortic balloon pump on in-hospital outcomes of cardiogenic shock: findings from a nationwide registry, China.ESC heart failure · 2021Article
- Predicting survival in patients with acute decompensated heart failure complicated by cardiogenic shock.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2021Article
- Current Landscape of Temporary Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Technology.US cardiology · 2021Review
- The clinical effects of IABP pumps combined with tirofiban in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction and on patients' serum levels.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
- Mechanical Support in Early Cardiogenic Shock: What Is the Role of Intra-aortic Balloon Counterpulsation?Current heart failure reports · 2020Review
- Myocardial ischemia and coronary disease in heart failure.Heart failure reviews · 2020Review
- Comparison of the Hemodynamic Response to Intra-Aortic Balloon Counterpulsation in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Resulting from Acute Myocardial Infarction Versus Acute Decompensated Heart Failure.The American journal of cardiology · 2019Article
- Mechanical Left Ventricular Unloading to Reduce Infarct Size During Acute Myocardial Infarction: Insight from Preclinical and Clinical Studies.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2019Review
- Clinical and hemodynamic effects of intra-aortic balloon pump therapy in chronic heart failure patients with cardiogenic shock.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2018Article
- Differential responses to larger volume intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation: Hemodynamic and clinical outcomes.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2018Article
- Ambulatory Intra Aortic Balloon Pump in Advanced Heart Failure.Cardiac failure review · 2018Review
- Predictors of intra-aortic balloon pump hemodynamic failure in non-acute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock.American heart journal · 2018Article
- Predictors of Hemodynamic Improvement and Stabilization Following Intraaortic Balloon Pump Implantation in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure.The Journal of invasive cardiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this work was to characterize the clinical response and identify predictors of clinical stabilization after intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP) support in patients with chronic systolic heart failure in cardiogenic shock before implantation of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD).
backgroundLimited data exist regarding the clinical response to IABP in patients with chronic heart failure in cardiogenic shock.
methodsWe identified 54 patients supported with IABP before LVAD implantation. Criteria for clinical decompensation after IABP insertion and before LVAD included the need for more advanced temporary support, initiation of mechanical ventilation or dialysis, increase in vasopressors/inotropes, refractory ventricular arrhythmias, or worsening acidosis. The absence of these indicated stabilization.
resultsClinical decompensation after IABP occurred in 23 patients (43%). Both patients who decompensated and those who stabilized had similar hemodynamic improvements after IABP support, but patients who decompensated required more vasopressors/inotropes. Clinical decompensation after IABP was associated with worse outcomes after LVAD implantation, including a 3-fold longer intensive care unit stay and 5-fold longer time on mechanical ventilation (P < .01 for both). Although baseline characteristics were similar between groups, right and left ventricular cardiac power indexes (cardiac power index = cardiac index × mean arterial pressure/451) identified patients who were likely to stabilize (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.82).
conclusionsAmong patients with chronic systolic heart failure who develop cardiogenic shock, more than one-half of patients stabilized with IABP support as a bridge to LVAD. Baseline measures of right and left ventricular cardiac power, reflecting work performed for a given flow and pressure, may allow clinicians to identify patients with sufficient contractile reserve who will be likely to stabilize with an IABP versus those who may need more aggressive ventricular support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.