Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26164156›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2015

Efficacy and duration of response to botulinum neurotoxin A (onabotulinumA) as a treatment for detrusor overactivity in women.

Navjeet Chohan, Paul Hilton, Karen Brown, Liz Dixon

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Functional Polymorphism in theJournal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Navjeet ChohanCity Hospitals Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland, UK.
Paul HiltonUrogynaecology Unit, Directorate of Women's Services, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, UK. paul.hilton@ncl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2541-5195
Karen BrownUrogynaecology Unit, Directorate of Women's Services, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, UK.
Liz DixonUrogynaecology Unit, Directorate of Women's Services, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, UK.
Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBSouth Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisOveractive bladder syndrome with urinary incontinence has a number of treatment options. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in the UK, the American Urological Association (AUA) and the European Association of Urology (EAU) recommend intradetrusor botulinum neurotoxin A (onabotulinumA) injections in women with proven detrusor overactivity (DO) in whom conservative therapies have failed to improve symptoms. However, the effects of individual onabotulinumA treatments are of short duration and patients usually require further treatments. There is little evidence to inform long-term management strategies using onabotulinumA for DO.

methodsA retrospective review of patients receiving intradetrusor onabotulinumA injections for DO over a 7-year period was conducted. The primary outcome measures included patient's subjective reports of symptom change following injections (efficacy) and the duration of symptomatic relief following each treatment.

resultsThe analysis included 136 patients. The mean time between patients receiving intradetrusor onabotulinumA and being added to the surgical waiting list for re-treatment varied between 8.5 and 10.4 months for the first five cycles of treatment with the longest time between the third and fourth cycles. This decreased to 5.5 and 5.25 (ANOVA p = 0.015) between the fifth and sixth cycles and between the sixth and seventh cycles of treatment, respectively. Only 19.9% of patients continued treatment beyond this, with four patients receiving a seventh treatment.

conclusionsOur results suggest that in patients who respond to onabotulinumA treatment, the duration of response declines after the fifth treatment, suggesting a possible tolerance effect and a subsequent decline in efficacy.

Indexed as

Acetylcholine Release InhibitorsAgedBotulinum Toxins, Type AFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUrinary Bladder, OveractiveAcetylcholine Release InhibitorsBotulinum Toxins, Type ABotulinum toxin ADetrusor overactivityEfficacyLong-term follow-upOnabotulinumAOveractive bladder syndrome

Identifiers

PMID26164156
OpenAlexW1208751892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.