ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2015
Efficacy and duration of response to botulinum neurotoxin A (onabotulinumA) as a treatment for detrusor overactivity in women.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- BDNF rs6265 polymorphism is not associated with the occurrence of overactive bladder and its response to intradetrusor injection of botulinum neurotoxin type A in female patients.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Association analysis of ADRB3:rs4994 with urodynamic outcome, six months after a single intra-detrusor injection of botulinum toxin, in women with overactive bladder.Pharmacological reports : PR · 2024Article
- Functional Polymorphism in theJournal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Trigone as a diagnostic and therapeutic target for bladder-centric interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome.International urogynecology journal · 2021Article
- Immunogenicity of Botulinum Toxin Formulations: Potential Therapeutic Implications.Advances in therapy · 2021Review
- Outcomes of a single trigone-only vs. 20 trigone-sparing injections of OnabotulinumtoxinA for refractory overactive bladder (OAB).International urology and nephrology · 2021Article
- Botulinum Toxin A: A Review of Potential Uses in Treatment of Female Urogenital and Pelvic Floor Disorders.Ochsner journal · 2020Review
- Assessment of Anticholinergic Use After Fading of BTX-A Effects in Refractory Idiopathic Overactive Bladder: A Prospective Blinded Randomized Trial.International neurourology journal · 2019Article
- Initial clinical experience with selective bladder denervation for refractory overactive bladder.Neurourology and urodynamics · 2019Article
- Advancing a Comprehensive Approach to the Study of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms.The Journal of urology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisOveractive bladder syndrome with urinary incontinence has a number of treatment options. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in the UK, the American Urological Association (AUA) and the European Association of Urology (EAU) recommend intradetrusor botulinum neurotoxin A (onabotulinumA) injections in women with proven detrusor overactivity (DO) in whom conservative therapies have failed to improve symptoms. However, the effects of individual onabotulinumA treatments are of short duration and patients usually require further treatments. There is little evidence to inform long-term management strategies using onabotulinumA for DO.
methodsA retrospective review of patients receiving intradetrusor onabotulinumA injections for DO over a 7-year period was conducted. The primary outcome measures included patient's subjective reports of symptom change following injections (efficacy) and the duration of symptomatic relief following each treatment.
resultsThe analysis included 136 patients. The mean time between patients receiving intradetrusor onabotulinumA and being added to the surgical waiting list for re-treatment varied between 8.5 and 10.4 months for the first five cycles of treatment with the longest time between the third and fourth cycles. This decreased to 5.5 and 5.25 (ANOVA p = 0.015) between the fifth and sixth cycles and between the sixth and seventh cycles of treatment, respectively. Only 19.9% of patients continued treatment beyond this, with four patients receiving a seventh treatment.
conclusionsOur results suggest that in patients who respond to onabotulinumA treatment, the duration of response declines after the fifth treatment, suggesting a possible tolerance effect and a subsequent decline in efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.