Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26164150›Full record

Observational studyRheumatology international2015

A European chart review study on early rheumatoid arthritis treatment patterns, clinical outcomes, and healthcare utilization.

Paul Emery, Caitlyn Solem, Istvan Majer, Joseph C Cappelleri, Miriam Tarallo

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Rheumatology international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Paul EmeryLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, Chapel Allerton Hospital, University of Leeds, Chapeltown Road, Leeds, LS7 4SA, UK. p.emery@leeds.ac.uk.
Caitlyn SolemPharmerit International, Bethesda, MD, USA. csolem@pharmerit.com.
Istvan MajerPharmerit International, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. imajer@pharmerit.com.
Joseph C CappelleriPfizer Inc., Groton, CT, USA. joseph.c.cappelleri@pfizer.com.
Miriam TaralloPfizer Italia, Rome, Italy. Miriam.Tarallo@pfizer.com.
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBPfizer (Italy) · ITPfizer (United States) · USPharmerit (Netherlands) · NLPharmerit (United States) · US

Funding

Arthritis Research UK 18475
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This retrospective medical chart review aimed to provide a current, real-world overview of biologic usage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Germany, Spain, and the UK, and estimate clinical and healthcare utilization outcomes associated with early versus late treatment. Adults (≥18 years) with a confirmed RA diagnosis between January 2008 and December 2010, who received biologic treatment for ≥3 months and had ≥12 months of follow-up were included. Early treatment was receipt of biologic agent ≤1 year after RA diagnosis. Outcomes included 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28) reduction of ≥1.2 from biologic start and remission (DAS28 < 2.6). Time to outcome was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. Of 328 patients enrolled (Germany [n = 111], Spain [n = 106], UK [n = 111]), 58.2 % received early biologic (Germany: 55.0 %, UK: 55.9 %, Spain: 64.2 %; p = 0.321). First-line biologics were more frequent in Spain (26.4 %) and Germany (19.8 %) versus the UK (7.2 %; p < 0.001). Late-treated patients were hospitalized more often than early-treated patients (10.5 vs 2.9 % [p = 0.006] for 9.0 vs 5.4 mean inpatient days [p = 0.408]). DAS28 was 5.1 at biologic initiation (n = 310); 73.5 % of patients had a DAS28 decrease of ≥1.2 and 44.5 % achieved remission. More patients had DAS28 decrease of ≥1.2 (79.2 vs 65.9 %; p = 0.009) and remission (51.1 vs 35.6 %; p = 0.007) with early versus late treatment, with a significant difference in Kaplan-Meier curves when indexing on time since diagnosis (p < 0.001) and biologic start (p = 0.024). In RA patients receiving biologic therapy, over half received biologic therapy early. Early initiation was associated with improved clinical outcomes and reduced hospitalization rates versus late treatment.

Indexed as

AdultAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidBiological ProductsDrug CostsDrug PrescriptionsEuropeFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Care SurveysHealth ResourcesHospital CostsHospitalizationHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLogistic ModelsAntirheumatic AgentsBiological ProductsBiologicDAS28Early biologic treatmentEuropeRheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID26164150
OpenAlexW916235721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.