Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26164139›Full record

ReviewUpdates in surgery2015

Mils for HCC: the state of art.

Andrea Belli, Corrado Fantini, Luigi Cioffi, Alberto D'Agostino, Giulio Belli

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Updates in surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Early stage liver cancer : Hepatocellular carcinoma].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2018
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrea BelliDepartment of General and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Loreto Nuovo Hospital, 80142, Naples, Italy, a.belli@istitutotumori.na.it.
Corrado Fantini
Luigi Cioffi
Alberto D'Agostino
Giulio Belli
Ospedale Santa Maria di Loreto Nuovo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After an initial skepticism, minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) gained popularity and is nowadays a consolidated option in specialized centers for the surgical treatment of selected patients affected by both benign and malignant liver diseases. Nevertheless, the role of MILS in the surgical treatment of hepato-cellular carcinoma (HCC) developed on the background of chronic liver disease is still a matter of debate. The indications and the current evidences on MILS for HCC are discussed in this paper. MILS being less invasive and harmful for the patients proved to offer a reduction in post-operative morbidity and specific benefits have been highlighted in case of patients affected by HCC and chronic liver disease. In fact, by minimizing liver manipulation and mobilization and by preserving the collateral blood and lymphatic flow, MILS seems to reduce the incidence of post-operative ascites and post-operative liver failure without compromising the oncologic outcomes. This has been confirmed by an analysis of 21 comparative studies and 5 metanalyses comparing MILS and open surgery for HCC. With an adequate surgical training, MILS for HCC can be undertaken safely even in case of major hepatectomies and technically demanding operations such as resections of posteriorly located tumors proved to be feasible in specialized centers. Therefore, with an appropriate patients' selection, MILS for HCC is becoming the preferred option for the surgical treatment of HCC in cirrhotic patients.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHepatectomyHumansLaparoscopyLiver NeoplasmsMaleMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPatient SafetyPostoperative ComplicationsPrognosisRisk AssessmentSurvival RateTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID26164139
OpenAlexW874644475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.