Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26163705›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2015

Two Theobroma cacao genotypes with contrasting pathogen tolerance show aberrant transcriptional and ROS responses after salicylic acid treatment.

Andrew S Fister, Shawn T O'Neil, Zi Shi, Yufan Zhang, Brett M Tyler, Mark J Guiltinan, Siela N Maximova

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew S FisterThe Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Shawn T O'NeilCenter for Genome Research and Biocomputing, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.
Zi ShiCenter for Applied Genetic Technologies, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Yufan ZhangThe Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Brett M TylerCenter for Genome Research and Biocomputing, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.
Mark J GuiltinanThe Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA The Department of Plant Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Siela N MaximovaThe Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA The Department of Plant Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA snm104@psu.edu.
Pennsylvania State University · USBiocom · USApplied Genetic Technologies (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the genetic basis of pathogen susceptibility in various crop plants is crucial to increasing the stability of food, feed, and fuel production. Varietal differences in defence responses provide insights into the mechanisms of resistance and are a key resource for plant breeders. To explore the role of salicylic acid in the regulation of defence in cacao, we demonstrated that SA treatment decreased susceptibility to a pod rot pathogen, Phytophthora tropicalis in two genotypes, Scavina 6 and Imperial College Selection 1, which differ in their resistance to several agriculturally important pathogens. Transient overexpression of TcNPR1, a major transcriptional regulator of the SA-dependent plant immune system, also increased pathogen tolerance in cacao leaves. To explore further the genetic basis of resistance in cacao, we used microarrays to measure gene expression profiles after salicylic acid (SA) treatment in these two cacao genotypes. The two genotypes displayed distinct transcriptional responses to SA. Unexpectedly, the expression profile of the susceptible genotype ICS1 included a larger number of pathogenesis-related genes that were induced by SA at 24h after treatment, whereas genes encoding many chloroplast and mitochondrial proteins implicated in reactive oxygen species production were up-regulated in the resistant genotype, Sca6. Sca6 accumulated significantly more superoxide at 24h after treatment of leaves with SA. These experiments revealed critical insights regarding the molecular differences between cacao varieties, which will allow a better understanding of defence mechanisms to help guide breeding programmes.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, PlantGenotypeCacaoDisease ResistanceMolecular Sequence DataPhytophthoraPlant DiseasesPlant ProteinsPlasmidsReactive Oxygen SpeciesSalicylic AcidSequence Analysis, DNAPlant ProteinsReactive Oxygen SpeciesSalicylic AcidCacaopathogenesis-related genesPhytophthora tropicalisreactive oxygen speciessalicylic acidTcNPR1.

Identifiers

PMID26163705
PMCPMC4588882
OpenAlexW1931497799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.