Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26163667›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2015

Extraordinary Genetic Diversity in a Wood Decay Mushroom.

Maria A Baranova, Maria D Logacheva, Aleksey A Penin, Vladimir B Seplyarskiy, Yana Y Safonova, Sergey A Naumenko, Anna V Klepikova, Evgeny S Gerasimov, Georgii A Bazykin, Timothy Y James and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Increased Cellulase Activity of Schizophyllum commune EO22 in Binary Associations with Streptomycetes.Doklady biological sciences : proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Biological sciences sections · 2025
    Article
  6. Evidence for the Existence of Mating Subtypes Within theJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. How Can We Resolve Lewontin's Paradox?Genome biology and evolution · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Risk assessment of fungal materials.Fungal biology and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Genetic Diversity and Dye-Decolorizing Spectrum ofJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria A BaranovaSchool of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia Institute for Information Transmission Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Kharkevich Institute), Moscow, Russia Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Maria D LogachevaInstitute for Information Transmission Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Kharkevich Institute), Moscow, Russia Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia A.N. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Aleksey A PeninInstitute for Information Transmission Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Kharkevich Institute), Moscow, Russia A.N. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia Department of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Vladimir B SeplyarskiySchool of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia Institute for Information Transmission Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Kharkevich Institute), Moscow, Russia Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Yana Y SafonovaAlgorithmic Biology Lab, St. Petersburg Academic University of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St Petersburg, Russia.
Sergey A NaumenkoSchool of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia Institute for Information Transmission Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Kharkevich Institute), Moscow, Russia Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia A.N. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Anna V KlepikovaInstitute for Information Transmission Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Kharkevich Institute), Moscow, Russia A.N. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Evgeny S GerasimovInstitute for Information Transmission Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Kharkevich Institute), Moscow, Russia A.N. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia Department of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Georgii A BazykinSchool of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia Institute for Information Transmission Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Kharkevich Institute), Moscow, Russia Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia A.N. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Timothy Y JamesDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan.
Alexey S KondrashovSchool of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia A.N. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan kondrash@umich.edu.
Institute for Information Transmission Problems · RULomonosov Moscow State University · RUPirogov Russian National Research Medical University · RUUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USSaint Petersburg Academic University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Populations of different species vary in the amounts of genetic diversity they possess. Nucleotide diversity π, the fraction of nucleotides that are different between two randomly chosen genotypes, has been known to range in eukaryotes between 0.0001 in Lynx lynx and 0.16 in Caenorhabditis brenneri. Here, we report the results of a comparative analysis of 24 haploid genotypes (12 from the United States and 12 from European Russia) of a split-gill fungus Schizophyllum commune. The diversity at synonymous sites is 0.20 in the American population of S. commune and 0.13 in the Russian population. This exceptionally high level of nucleotide diversity also leads to extreme amino acid diversity of protein-coding genes. Using whole-genome resequencing of 2 parental and 17 offspring haploid genotypes, we estimate that the mutation rate in S. commune is high, at 2.0 × 10(-8) (95% CI: 1.1 × 10(-8) to 4.1 × 10(-8)) per nucleotide per generation. Therefore, the high diversity of S. commune is primarily determined by its elevated mutation rate, although high effective population size likely also plays a role. Small genome size, ease of cultivation and completion of the life cycle in the laboratory, free-living haploid life stages and exceptionally high variability of S. commune make it a promising model organism for population, quantitative, and evolutionary genetics.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAgaricalesNucleotidesPolymorphism, GeneticWoodNucleotidesde novo mutation rategenetic variationhyperdiversitypopulation genetics

Identifiers

PMID26163667
PMCPMC4576712
OpenAlexW2166110950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.