Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26163534›Full record

SynthesisActa radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987)2016

F18-FDG-PET for recurrent differentiated thyroid cancer: a systematic meta-analysis.

Torjan Haslerud, Katrin Brauckhoff, Lars Reisæter, Regina Küfner Lein, Achim Heinecke, Jan Erik Varhaug, Martin Biermann

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [Molecular imaging and biology · 2020
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Utility ofIndian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Torjan HaslerudNuclear Medicine/PET-Center, Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Katrin BrauckhoffSection for Endocrine Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Lars ReisæterSection for Oncological Imaging, Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Regina Küfner LeinMedical and Dental Library, University of Bergen, Bergen/Norway.
Achim HeineckeInstitute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster, Münster/Germany.
Jan Erik VarhaugSection for Oncological Imaging, Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen/Norway.
Martin BiermannNuclear Medicine/PET-Center, Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen/Norway martin.biermann@uib.no.
Haukeland University Hospital · NOUniversity of Bergen · NOUniversity of Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPositron emission tomography (PET) with fluor-18-deoxy-glucose (FDG) is widely used for diagnosing recurrent or metastatic disease in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET for DTC in patients after ablative therapy. MATERIAL AND

methodsA systematic search was conducted in Medline/PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Open Grey looking for all English-language original articles on the performance of FDG-PET in series of at least 20 patients with DTC having undergone ablative therapy including total thyroidectomy. Diagnostic performance measures were pooled using Reitsma's bivariate model.

resultsThirty-four publications between 1996 and 2014 met the inclusion criteria. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 79.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73.9-84.1) and 79.4% (95% CI, 71.2-85.4), respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.858.

conclusionF18-FDG-PET is a useful method for detecting recurrent DTC in patients having undergone ablative therapy.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPositron-Emission TomographyThyroid NeoplasmsFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsHead/neckneoplasmsPET-CTthyroid

Identifiers

PMID26163534
PMCPMC5015757
OpenAlexW2129020981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.