ArticleInvestigational new drugs2015
Topotecan plus cyclophosphamide in adults with relapsed or refractory pediatric-type sarcoma: a retrospective analysis from the German Sarcoma Medical Oncology Group (AIO).
Article in Investigational new drugs, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current Role of Topoisomerase I Inhibitors for the Treatment of Mesenchymal Malignancies and Their Potential Future Use as Payload of Sarcoma-Specific Antibody-Drug Conjugates.Oncology research and treatment · 2024Review
- Treatment options in unresectable soft tissue and bone sarcoma of the extremities and pelvis - a systematic literature review.EFORT open reviews · 2020Review
- Structure-Based Drug Design and Identification of HJournal of medicinal chemistry · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo assess the efficacy and safety of topotecan and cyclophosphamide (TC) in adult patients with pediatric-type sarcoma subtypes who failed induction chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND
methodsPatients with pediatric sarcoma subtypes, refractory to or relapsed after at least one prior induction chemotherapy, inoperable, ECOG PS 0-2, with measurable, progressive disease (PD), adequate organ functions, who have been treated with TC combination were retrospectively analysed within the AIO and SAREZ/BMBF network.
resultsThirty-nine patients, median age 28 years (18-58), 14 females, 25 males, have been identified. All patients had received induction treatment according to (inter)national study protocols. Second-line TC was applied in 33 patients (≥3rd-line in 6 patients). Twenty-three patients had refractory disease (evidence of PD during induction chemotherapy); 8 patients experienced an early relapse within 6 months as well as 8 patients after more than 24 months (late relapse). A median of 3 cycles (range, 1-6) had been applied and antitumor activity was: CR 2.6 %, PR 7.9 %, and disease stabilisation (SD) 26.3 %. PR lasted 32.8 months and median duration in patients with SD was 5 months (range, 2.0-14.7). The 3/6-months progression-free rates were 43.2 and 18.9 %.
conclusionsLimited activity was seen in adult pts with refractory or relapsed pediatric-type sarcomas with the regimen which has proven activity in pediatric patients. Adults with refractory small cell sarcoma appear to have a similar dismal outcome as seen in pts with common adult-type histologies; however, a subset of patients has achieved long-lasting remissions on TC resulting in long-term survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.