Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26163318›Full record

ArticleEukaryotic cell2015

Analysis of the Aspergillus fumigatus Biofilm Extracellular Matrix by Solid-State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy.

Courtney Reichhardt, Jose A G Ferreira, Lydia-Marie Joubert, Karl V Clemons, David A Stevens, Lynette Cegelski

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eukaryotic cell, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Biofilm Formation inMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. New Vision of Cell Walls inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Interactions between Bacteria andJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. The Determination, Monitoring, Molecular Mechanisms and Formation of Biofilm in E. coli.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Solid-state NMR analysis of unlabeled fungal cell walls fromJournal of structural biology: X · 2022
    Article
  19. Organic composition of epilithic biofilms from agricultural and urban watershed in South Brazil.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Courtney ReichhardtDepartment of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Jose A G FerreiraDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA California Institute for Medical Research, San Jose, California, USA.
Lydia-Marie JoubertCell Sciences Imaging Facility, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Karl V ClemonsDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA California Institute for Medical Research, San Jose, California, USA.
David A StevensDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA California Institute for Medical Research, San Jose, California, USA.
Lynette CegelskiDepartment of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA cegelski@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · USCalifornia Institute for Medical Research · US

Funding

Structure, Function, and Disruption of Microbial Amyloid Assembly and Biofilm ForDP2OD007488 · OD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CEGELSKI, LYNETTE S · 2010 to 2010
$2.4M
NCRR NIH HHS 1S10RR02678001NIH HHS DP2 OD007488NIH HHS DP2OD007488
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aspergillus fumigatus is commonly responsible for lethal fungal infections among immunosuppressed individuals. A. fumigatus forms biofilm communities that are of increasing biomedical interest due to the association of biofilms with chronic infections and their increased resistance to antifungal agents and host immune factors. Understanding the composition of microbial biofilms and the extracellular matrix is important to understanding function and, ultimately, to developing strategies to inhibit biofilm formation. We implemented a solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) approach to define compositional parameters of the A. fumigatus extracellular matrix (ECM) when biofilms are formed in RPMI 1640 nutrient medium. Whole biofilm and isolated matrix networks were also characterized by electron microscopy, and matrix proteins were identified through protein gel analysis. The (13)C NMR results defined and quantified the carbon contributions in the insoluble ECM, including carbonyls, aromatic carbons, polysaccharide carbons (anomeric and nonanomerics), aliphatics, etc. Additional (15)N and (31)P NMR spectra permitted more specific annotation of the carbon pools according to C-N and C-P couplings. Together these data show that the A. fumigatus ECM produced under these growth conditions contains approximately 40% protein, 43% polysaccharide, 3% aromatic-containing components, and up to 14% lipid. These fundamental chemical parameters are needed to consider the relationships between composition and function in the A. fumigatus ECM and will enable future comparisons with other organisms and with A. fumigatus grown under alternate conditions.

Indexed as

BiofilmsAspergillus fumigatusExtracellular MatrixExtracellular Matrix ProteinsFungal ProteinsExtracellular Matrix ProteinsFungal Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26163318
PMCPMC4621319
OpenAlexW1916795285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.