Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26163032›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2015

Reducing and managing faecal incontinence in people with advanced dementia who are resident in care homes: protocol for a realist synthesis.

Claire Goodman, Jo Rycroft Malone, Christine Norton, Danielle Harari, Rowan Harwood, Brenda Roe, Bridget Russell, Mandy Fader, Marina Buswell, Vari M Drennan and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Claire GoodmanCentre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.
Jo Rycroft MaloneSchool of Healthcare Sciences, Bangor University School of Health Care Sciences, Bangor, UK.
Christine NortonFlorence Nightingale School of Nursing & Midwifery, King's College London, London, UK.
Danielle HarariDivision of Health and Social Care, Department of Ageing and Health, Guys and St Thomas', King's College London, London, UK.
Rowan HarwoodHealth Care of Older People Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4920-6718
Brenda RoeFaculty of Health and Social Care, Edge Hill University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Bridget RussellCentre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.
Mandy FaderDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Marina BuswellCentre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.
Vari M DrennanFaculty of Health, Social Care and Education, St Georges University of London and Kingston University, UK.
Frances BunnCentre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.
University of Hertfordshire · GBKing's College London · GBBangor University · GBEdge Hill University · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBSt George's, University of London · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

Department of Health HTA/13/75/01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFaecal incontinence (FI) is the involuntary loss of liquid or solid stool that is a social or hygienic problem. The prevalence of FI in residents of care homes is high, but it is not an inevitable consequence of old age or dementia. There is good evidence on risk factors, but few studies provide evidence about effective interventions. There is a need to understand how, why, and in what circumstances particular programmes to reduce and manage FI are effective (or not) for people with dementia. The purpose of this review is to identify which (elements of the) interventions could potentially be effective, and examine the barriers and facilitators to the acceptability, uptake and implementation of interventions designed to address FI in people with dementia who are resident in care homes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A realist synthesis approach to review the evidence will be used which will include studies on continence, person-centred care, implementation research in care homes, workforce and research on care home culture. An iterative four-stage approach is planned. Phase 1: development of an initial programme theory or theories that will be 'tested' through a first scoping of the literature and consultation with five stakeholder groups (care home providers, user representatives, academics and practice educators, clinicians with a special interest in FI and continence specialists). Phase 2: a systematic search and analysis of published and unpublished evidence to test and develop the programme theories identified in phase 1. Phase 3: validation of programme theory/ies with a purposive sample of participants from phase 1. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The overall protocol does not require ethical review. The University research ethics committee will review interviews conducted as part of phase 1 and 3. The final fourth phase will synthesise and develop recommendations for practice and develop testable hypotheses for further research.

Indexed as

DementiaFecal IncontinenceAged, 80 and overClinical ProtocolsEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHomes for the AgedHumansInstitutionalizationMaleNursing HomesGERIATRIC MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID26163032
PMCPMC4499729
OpenAlexW1827692133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.