ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2015
Repeatability of in vivo quantification of atherosclerotic carotid artery plaque components by supervised multispectral classification.
Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- A comparison of carotid atherosclerosis in symptomatic patients between 2002-2005 and 2012-2015 cohorts using multi-contrast magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2021Article
- Shape and Location of Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque and Intraplaque Hemorrhage: A High-resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2019Article
- Vessel wall characterization using quantitative MRI: what's in a number?Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2018Review
- A Convolutional Neural Network for Automatic Characterization of Plaque Composition in Carotid Ultrasound.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2017Article
- Semi-automatic carotid intraplaque hemorrhage detection and quantification on Magnetization-Prepared Rapid Acquisition Gradient-Echo (MP-RAGE) with optimized threshold selection.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2016Article
- Manual versus Automated Carotid Artery Plaque Component Segmentation in High and Lower Quality 3.0 Tesla MRI Scans.PloS one · 2016Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the agreement and scan-rescan repeatability of automated and manual plaque segmentation for the quantification of in vivo carotid artery plaque components from multi-contrast MRI. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwenty-three patients with 30-70% stenosis underwent two 3T MR carotid vessel wall exams within a 1 month interval. T1w, T2w, PDw and TOF images were acquired around the region of maximum vessel narrowing. Manual delineation of the vessel wall and plaque components (lipid, calcification, loose matrix) by an experienced observer provided the reference standard for training and evaluation of an automated plaque classifier. Areas of different plaque components and fibrous tissue were quantified and compared between segmentation methods and scan sessions.
resultsIn total, 304 slices from 23 patients were included in the segmentation experiment, in which 144 aligned slice pairs were available for repeatability analysis. The correlation between manual and automated segmented areas was 0.35 for lipid, 0.66 for calcification, 0.50 for loose matrix and 0.82 for fibrous tissue. For the comparison between scan sessions, the coefficient of repeatability of area measurement obtained by automated segmentation was lower than by manual delineation for lipid (9.9 vs. 17.1 mm(2)), loose matrix (13.8 vs. 21.2 mm(2)) and fibrous tissue (24.6 vs. 35.0 mm(2)), and was similar for calcification (20.0 vs. 17.6 mm(2)).
conclusionApplication of an automated classifier for segmentation of carotid vessel wall plaque components from in vivo MRI results in improved scan-rescan repeatability compared to manual analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.