Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26162910›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2015

Employers' views on the promotion of workplace health and wellbeing: a qualitative study.

Melanie Pescud, Renee Teal, Trevor Shilton, Terry Slevin, Melissa Ledger, Pippa Waterworth, Michael Rosenberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Ping pong for health: the meaning of space in a sport based health intervention at the workplace.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2020
    Trial
  7. Workplace Wellbeing in Ontario's Public Sector: Employee and Employer Perspectives on Workplace Supports.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Melanie PescudHealth Promotion Evaluation Unit, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, 6009, Australia. melanie.pescud@anu.edu.au.
Renee TealHealth Promotion Evaluation Unit, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, 6009, Australia. renee.teal@uwa.edu.au.
Trevor ShiltonNational Heart Foundation (WA), Subiaco, Australia. Trevor.Shilton@heartfoundation.org.au.
Terry SlevinCancer Council WA, Shenton Park, Australia. Terry@cancerwa.asn.au.
Melissa LedgerCancer Council WA, Shenton Park, Australia. MLedger@cancerwa.asn.au.
Pippa WaterworthHealth Promotion Evaluation Unit, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, 6009, Australia. philippa.waterworth@research.uwa.edu.au.
Michael RosenbergHealth Promotion Evaluation Unit, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, 6009, Australia. michael.rosenberg@uwa.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe evidence surrounding the value of workplace health promotion in positively influencing employees' health and wellbeing via changes to their health behaviours is growing. The aim of the study was to explore employers' views on the promotion of workplace health and wellbeing and the factors affecting these views.

methodsUsing a qualitative phenomenological approach, 10 focus groups were conducted with employers selected from a range of industries and geographical locations within Western Australia. The total sample size was 79.

resultsThree factors were identified: employers' conceptualization of workplace health and wellbeing; employers' descriptions of (un)healthy workers and perceptions surrounding the importance of healthy workers; and employers' beliefs around the role the workplace should play in influencing health.

conclusionsProgress may be viable in promoting health and wellbeing if a multifaceted approach is employed taking into account the complex factors influencing employers' views. This could include an education campaign providing information about what constitutes health and wellbeing beyond the scope of occupational health and safety paradigms along with information on the benefits of workplace health and wellbeing aligned with perceptions relating to healthy and unhealthy workers.

Indexed as

AttitudeOccupational HealthAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHealth BehaviorHealth PromotionHumansMaleQualitative ResearchResidence CharacteristicsWestern AustraliaWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID26162910
PMCPMC4499225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.