ArticleAoB PLANTS2015
Integrating network ecology with applied conservation: a synthesis and guide to implementation.
Article in AoB PLANTS, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 229 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing Pollinator Community Recovery in Restored Agroecosystems Using the Recovery Debt Framework.Global change biology · 2026Article
- Unveiling the Patterns of Wild Bee-Plant Interactions on a Large and Mostly Unexplored Mediterranean Island (Sardinia, Italy).Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Untangling Sampling Bias From Lemur Dietary Specialization.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Article
- Ecological Network Theory Boosts Land Maxing Benefits for Biodiversity: An Example with Tropical Bee-Plant Interactions.Insects · 2025Article
- Mutualism and Dispersal Heterogeneity Shape Stability, Biodiversity, and Structure of Theoretical Plant-Pollinator Meta-Networks.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Urban environments increase generalization of hummingbird-plant networks across climate gradients.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- High Resource Overlap and a Consistently Generalised Pattern of Interactions in a Bat-Flower Network in a Seasonally Dry Landscape.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Spatial and Temporal Variations in Richness, Diversity and Abundance of Floral Visitors of Curry Plants (Insects · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Latitudinal and anthropogenic effects on the structuring of networks linking blood-feeding flies and their vertebrate hosts.Medical and veterinary entomology · 2023Article
- Rapid monitoring of ecological persistence.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- The degree of urbanisation reduces wild bee and butterfly diversity and alters the patterns of flower-visitation in urban dry grasslands.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Species-specific interactions in avian-bryophyte dispersal networks.Royal Society open science · 2022Article
- Inferring species interactions from ecological survey data: A mechanistic approach to predict quantitative food webs of seed feeding by carabid beetles.Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Plant species with the trait of continuous flowering do not hold core roles in a Neotropical lowland plant-pollinating insect network.Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Ecological plasticity governs ecosystem services in multilayer networks.Communications biology · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ecological networks are a useful tool to study the complexity of biotic interactions at a community level. Advances in the understanding of network patterns encourage the application of a network approach in other disciplines than theoretical ecology, such as biodiversity conservation. So far, however, practical applications have been meagre. Here we present a framework for network analysis to be harnessed to advance conservation management by using plant-pollinator networks and islands as model systems. Conservation practitioners require indicators to monitor and assess management effectiveness and validate overall conservation goals. By distinguishing between two network attributes, the 'diversity' and 'distribution' of interactions, on three hierarchical levels (species, guild/group and network) we identify seven quantitative metrics to describe changes in network patterns that have implications for conservation. Diversity metrics are partner diversity, vulnerability/generality, interaction diversity and interaction evenness, and distribution metrics are the specialization indices d' and [Formula: see text] and modularity. Distribution metrics account for sampling bias and may therefore be suitable indicators to detect human-induced changes to plant-pollinator communities, thus indirectly assessing the structural and functional robustness and integrity of ecosystems. We propose an implementation pathway that outlines the stages that are required to successfully embed a network approach in biodiversity conservation. Most importantly, only if conservation action and study design are aligned by practitioners and ecologists through joint experiments, are the findings of a conservation network approach equally beneficial for advancing adaptive management and ecological network theory. We list potential obstacles to the framework, highlight the shortfall in empirical, mostly experimental, network data and discuss possible solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.