Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26162892›Full record

ArticleArthritis research & therapy2015

Window of opportunity to achieve major outcomes in early rheumatoid arthritis patients: how persistence with therapy matters.

Irazú Contreras-Yáñez, Virginia Pascual-Ramos

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03389711 (INCMNSZ Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Cohort), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03389711 unknown statusnot on this map

INCMNSZ Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Cohort

TypeobservationalSponsorNational Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Salvador ZubiranRan2004 to 2024Enrolled237ConditionsEarly Rheumatoid Arthritis, Rheumatoid ArthritisArmsDMARD´s and multidisciplinary treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Irazú Contreras-YáñezDepartment of Immunology and Rheumatology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Vasco de Quiroga 15, Colonia Belisario Domínguez Sección XVI, 14080, Tlalpan, DF, Mexico. irazucy@yahoo.com.mx.
Virginia Pascual-RamosDepartment of Immunology and Rheumatology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Vasco de Quiroga 15, Colonia Belisario Domínguez Sección XVI, 14080, Tlalpan, DF, Mexico. virtichu@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBenefits of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) in early rheumatoid arthritis patients (ERAP) will be achieved if patients follow prescribed treatment. Objective was to investigate whether timing of first non-persistence period and/or duration of persistence during the first 4 years of follow-up predicted disease outcomes at the 5(th) year in a cohort of ERAP, initiated in 2004. PATIENTS AND

methodsUp to February 2015, charts of 107 ERAP with at least 5 years of follow-up and prospective 6-month assessments of disease activity, disability and persistence were reviewed. Non-persistence was defined as omission of DMARD and/or corticosteroids for at least 7 consecutive days; regarding methotrexate, one weekly missing dose was considered non-persistence. Persistence was recorded through an interview (up to 2008) and thereafter through a questionnaire; persistence duration was recorded in months of continuous medicationtaking. At the 5(th) year, disease activity was defined according to Disease Activity Score (DAS)28, and disability according to Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). Descriptive statistics and linear and Cox regression analyses were used.

resultsAt study entry, patients were more frequently middle-aged (39.1 ± 13.3 years) and female (88.8%), as well as more likely to have high disease activity and disability. Over the first 4 years of follow-up, 54.2% of the patients had indications for oral corticosteroids and all traditional DMARDs. Almost 70% had at least one period of non-persistence, and their follow-up (median, 25th-75th interquartile range) to first non-persistence period was 13 months (1-31). Persistence duration during the first 4 years predicted subsequent DAS28 (in addition to gender and baseline DAS28) and HAQ (in addition to age). During the 5(th) year, 68 patients (56 women) achieved sustained remission (DAS28 < 2.6). In female population (n = 95), baseline DAS28 (odds ratio [OR], 0.65; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.50-0.83; p = 0.001) and persistence duration (OR, 1.04; 95 % CI, 1-1.08; p = 0.05) were predictors. Also, 84 patients achieved sustained function (HAQ <0.21), and baseline DAS28 and age were the only predictors. Timing of first non-persistence period did not impact outcomes.

conclusionsPersistence duration with DMARDs within the first 4 years of RA predicted subsequent favorable outcomes in ERAP; additional predictors were younger age, male gender and lower disease activity at diagnosis.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionMedication AdherenceAdultAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidEarly DiagnosisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAntirheumatic Agents

Identifiers

PMID26162892
PMCPMC4499189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.