Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26162801›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2017

Clinical outcomes and biomechanical analysis of posterolateral bundle augmentation in patients with partial anterior cruciate ligament tears.

Takehiko Matsushita, Ryosuke Kuroda, Yuichiro Nishizawa, Daisuke Araki, Yuichi Hoshino, Kanto Nagai, Tomoyuki Matsumoto, Masahiro Kurosaka

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Anatomic and non-anatomic anterior cruciate ligament posterolateral bundle augmentation affects graft function.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2018
    Article
  10. Electromagnetic tracking of the pivot-shift.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2016
    Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Takehiko MatsushitaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-1 Kusunoki-Cho, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.
Ryosuke KurodaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-1 Kusunoki-Cho, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan. kurodar@med.kobe-u.ac.jp.
Yuichiro NishizawaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-1 Kusunoki-Cho, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.
Daisuke ArakiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-1 Kusunoki-Cho, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.
Yuichi HoshinoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-1 Kusunoki-Cho, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.
Kanto NagaiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-1 Kusunoki-Cho, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.
Tomoyuki MatsumotoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-1 Kusunoki-Cho, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.
Masahiro KurosakaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-1 Kusunoki-Cho, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.
Kobe University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo examine the clinical and biomechanical results of posterolateral (PL) augmentation to reconstruct damaged PL bundle while preserving the less-damaged anteromedial bundle for partial anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears in comparison with double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

methodsSixteen patients who underwent PL augmentation for partial ACL tears (Group P) and 37 patients who underwent double-bundle ACL reconstructions for complete ACL tears were examined (Group D). Anterior tibial translation (ATT) was evaluated using the KT-1000 arthrometer. ATT during the Lachman test and acceleration of posterior tibial translation (APT) during the pivot shift test were evaluated using an electromagnetic measurement system (EMS). Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Lysholm score. Second-look arthroscopy was performed 1 year after surgery.

resultsThe mean postoperative Lysholm scores were 91.7 ± 12.2 and 94.6 ± 7.2 in Groups P and D, respectively, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. The mean side-to-side difference of ATT on the KT-1000 was significantly improved in both Groups P and D. In the EMS analysis, the mean side-to-side difference of ATT and the mean APT were significantly improved in both Groups P and D. There was no significant difference in the second-look evaluation between the two groups.

conclusionsThe clinical and biomechanical outcomes of PL augmentation were satisfactorily comparable to those of double-bundle ACL reconstruction. PL augmentation could be a useful treatment option for patients with partial ACL tears. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Indexed as

AdultAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionArthroscopyElectromagnetic PhenomenaFemaleHumansJoint InstabilityMaleSecond-Look SurgeryTibiaTreatment OutcomeAugmentationDouble-bundle ACL reconstructionPartial ACL tearPosterolateral bundle

Identifiers

PMID26162801
OpenAlexW926347687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.