Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26162799›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2015

PSMA PET/CT with Glu-urea-Lys-(Ahx)-[⁶⁸Ga(HBED-CC)] versus 3D CT volumetric lymph node assessment in recurrent prostate cancer.

Frederik L Giesel, H Fiedler, M Stefanova, F Sterzing, M Rius, K Kopka, J H Moltz, A Afshar-Oromieh, P L Choyke, U Haberkorn and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
16.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Metaanalysis ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. A Feasibility Study Showing [Molecular imaging and biology · 2016
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Real world experience with [EJNMMI reports · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. (Research in diagnostic and interventional imaging · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Annals of nuclear medicine · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Novel PET imaging methods for prostate cancer.World journal of urology · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Interobserver variability, detection rate, and lesion patterns ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Frederik L GieselDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, INF 400, University Hospital Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. frederik@egiesel.com.
H FiedlerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, INF 400, University Hospital Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
M StefanovaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, INF 400, University Hospital Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
F SterzingDepartment of RadioOncology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
M RiusInstitute for Transuranium Elements (ITU), European Commission, Karlsruhe, Germany.
K KopkaRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany.
J H MoltzRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany.
A Afshar-OromiehDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, INF 400, University Hospital Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
P L ChoykeMolecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA.
U HaberkornDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, INF 400, University Hospital Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
C KratochwilDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, INF 400, University Hospital Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DENational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Prostate Cancer ImagingZIABC010655 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI CHOYKE, PETER L · 2009 to 2025
$49.2M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePET/CT with the PSMA ligand is a powerful new method for the early detection of nodal metastases in patients with biochemical relapse. The purpose of this retrospective investigation was to evaluate the volume and dimensions of nodes identified by Glu-urea-Lys-(Ahx)-[(68)Ga(HBED-CC)] ((68)Ga-PSMA-11) in the setting of recurrent prostate cancer.

methodsAll PET/CT images were acquired 60 ± 10 min after intravenous injection of (68)Ga-PSMA-11 (mean dose 176 MBq). In 21 patients with recurrent prostate cancer and rising PSA, 49 PSMA-positive lymph nodes were identified. Using semiautomated lymph node segmentation software, node volume and short-axis and long-axis dimensions were measured and compared with the maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax). Round nodes greater than or equal to 8 mm were considered positive by morphological criteria alone. The percentage of nodes identified by elevated SUVmax but not by conventional morphological criteria was determined.

resultsThe mean volume of (68)Ga-PSMA-11-positive nodes was 0.5 ml (range 0.2 - 2.3 ml), and the mean short-axis diameter was 5.8 mm (range 2.4 - 13.3 mm). In 7 patients (33.3 %) with 31 PSMA-positive nodes only 11 (36 %) were morphologically positive based on diameters >8 mm on CT. In the remaining 14 patients (66.7 %), 18 (37 %) of PSMA positive lymph nodes had short-axis diameters <8 mm with a mean short-axis diameter of 5.0 mm (range 2.4 - 7.9 mm). Thus, in this population, (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT detected nodal recurrence in two-thirds of patients who would have been missed using conventional morphological criteria.

conclusion(68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT is more sensitive than CT based 3D volumetric lymph node evaluation in determining the node status of patients with recurrent prostate cancer, and is a promising method of restaging prostate cancers in this setting.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalMultimodal ImagingOligopeptidesPositron-Emission TomographyAgedEdetic AcidGallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedProstatic NeoplasmsRadiographyRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesEdetic Acidgallium 68 PSMA-11Gallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesOligopeptides68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CTLymph node evaluationLymph node metastasisRecurrent prostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID26162799
PMCPMC4589548
OpenAlexW2410896679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.