Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26162771›Full record

SynthesisPersonality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc2016

The Impact of Asking Intention or Self-Prediction Questions on Subsequent Behavior: A Meta-Analysis.

Chantelle Wood, Mark Conner, Eleanor Miles, Tracy Sandberg, Natalie Taylor, Gaston Godin, Paschal Sheeran

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Enhanced Invitations Using the Question-Behavior Effect and Financial Incentives to Promote Health Check Uptake in Primary Care.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2018
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Activation Versus Change as a Principle Underlying Intervention Strategies to Promote Health Behaviors.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. A qualitative examination of intentions and willingness for heavy drinking among young adult high-intensity drinkers.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chantelle WoodUniversity of Sheffield, UK chantelle.wood@sheffield.ac.uk.
Mark ConnerUniversity of Leeds, UK.
Eleanor MilesUniversity of Sussex, UK.
Tracy SandbergUniversity of Leeds, UK.
Natalie TaylorMacquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Gaston GodinLaval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Paschal SheeranUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current meta-analysis estimated the magnitude of the impact of asking intention and self-prediction questions on rates of subsequent behavior, and examined mediators and moderators of this question-behavior effect (QBE). Random-effects meta-analysis on 116 published tests of the effect indicated that intention/prediction questions have a small positive effect on behavior (d+ = 0.24). Little support was observed for attitude accessibility, cognitive dissonance, behavioral simulation, or processing fluency explanations of the QBE. Multivariate analyses indicated significant effects of social desirability of behavior/behavior domain (larger effects for more desirable and less risky behaviors), difficulty of behavior (larger effects for easy-to-perform behaviors), and sample type (larger effects among student samples). Although this review controls for co-occurrence of moderators in multivariate analyses, future primary research should systematically vary moderators in fully factorial designs. Further primary research is also needed to unravel the mechanisms underlying different variants of the QBE.

Indexed as

Behavior ControlIntentionSocial DesirabilityAttitudeForecastingHumansStudentsbehavior changemere-measurement effectmeta-analysisquestion–behavior effectself-prophecy effect

Identifiers

PMID26162771
PMCPMC4931712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.