Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26162609›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2015

Prognostic role of the LCS6 KRAS variant in locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the EXPERT-C trial.

F Sclafani, I Chau, D Cunningham, C Peckitt, A Lampis, J C Hahne, C Braconi, J Tabernero, B Glimelius, A Cervantes and 9 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Oncology reviews · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

F SclafaniDepartment of Medicine, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Surrey.
I ChauDepartment of Medicine, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Surrey.
D CunninghamDepartment of Medicine, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Surrey.
C PeckittDepartment of Medicine, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Surrey.
A LampisDivision of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London and Sutton.
J C HahneDivision of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London and Sutton.
C BraconiDepartment of Medicine, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Surrey; Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London and Sutton, UK.
J TaberneroDepartment of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
B GlimeliusDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden.
A CervantesDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
R BegumDepartment of Medicine, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Surrey.
D Gonzalez De CastroDepartment of Medicine, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Surrey.
S Hulkki WilsonDepartment of Medicine, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Surrey.
Z EltahirDepartment of Medicine, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Surrey.
A WotherspoonDepartment of Medicine, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Surrey.
D TaitDepartment of Medicine, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Surrey.
G BrownDepartment of Medicine, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Surrey.
J OatesDepartment of Medicine, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Surrey.
N ValeriDepartment of Medicine, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Surrey; Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London and Sutton. Electronic address: nicola.valeri@icr.ac.uk.
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBInstitute of Cancer Research · GBINCLIVA Health Research Institute · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUppsala University · SE

Funding

Cancer Research UK 18052Cancer Research UK A18052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLethal-7 (let-7) is a tumour suppressor miRNA which acts by down-regulating several oncogenes including KRAS. A single-nucleotide polymorphism (rs61764370, T > G base substitution) in the let-7 complementary site 6 (LCS-6) of KRAS mRNA has been shown to predict prognosis in early-stage colorectal cancer (CRC) and benefit from anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies in metastatic CRC. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe analysed rs61764370 in EXPERT-C, a randomised phase II trial of neoadjuvant CAPOX followed by chemoradiotherapy, surgery and adjuvant CAPOX plus or minus cetuximab in locally advanced rectal cancer. DNA was isolated from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumour tissue and genotyped using a PCR-based commercially available assay. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used to calculate survival estimates and compare treatment arms.

resultsA total of 155/164 (94.5%) patients were successfully analysed, of whom 123 (79.4%) and 32 (20.6%) had the LCS-6 TT and LCS-6 TG genotype, respectively. Carriers of the G allele were found to have a statistically significantly higher rate of complete response (CR) after neoadjuvant therapy (28.1% versus 10.6%; P = 0.020) and a trend for better 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) [77.4% versus 64.5%: hazard ratio (HR) 0.56; P = 0.152] and overall survival (OS) rates (80.3% versus 71.9%: HR 0.59; P = 0.234). Both CR and survival outcomes were independent of the use of cetuximab. The negative prognostic effect associated with KRAS mutation appeared to be stronger in patients with the LCS-6 TT genotype (HR PFS 1.70, P = 0.078; HR OS 1.79, P = 0.082) compared with those with the LCS-6 TG genotype (HR PFS 1.33, P = 0.713; HR OS 1.01, P = 0.995).

conclusionThis analysis suggests that rs61764370 may be a biomarker of response to neoadjuvant treatment and an indicator of favourable outcome in locally advanced rectal cancer possibly by mitigating the poor prognosis of KRAS mutation. In this setting, however, this polymorphism does not appear to predict cetuximab benefit.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorCapecitabineCetuximabChemoradiotherapyCombined Modality TherapyDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGenetic MarkersGenotypeHumansMaleMicroRNAsMiddle AgedBiomarkers, TumorCapecitabineCetuximabGenetic MarkersKRAS protein, humanMicroRNAsmirnlet7 microRNA, humanOrganoplatinum CompoundsOxaliplatinProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)cetuximabKRASLCS-6 KRAS variantlet-7rectal cancersingle-nucleotide polymorphism

Identifiers

PMID26162609
PMCPMC4551162
OpenAlexW1911271056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.