Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26162553›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2015

Estimating individual contribution from group-based structural correlation networks.

Manish Saggar, S M Hadi Hosseini, Jennifer L Bruno, Eve-Marie Quintin, Mira M Raman, Shelli R Kesler, Allan L Reiss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The network neuropsychology of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Morphological integration of the human brain across adolescence and adulthood.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Manish SaggarCenter for Interdisciplinary Brain Sciences Research, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA USA. Electronic address: saggar@stanford.edu.
S M Hadi HosseiniCenter for Interdisciplinary Brain Sciences Research, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA USA.
Jennifer L BrunoCenter for Interdisciplinary Brain Sciences Research, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA USA.
Eve-Marie QuintinCenter for Interdisciplinary Brain Sciences Research, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA USA.
Mira M RamanCenter for Interdisciplinary Brain Sciences Research, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA USA.
Shelli R KeslerDepartment of Neuro-oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Allan L ReissCenter for Interdisciplinary Brain Sciences Research, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA USA.

Funding

Mapping the Human Connectome: Structure, Function, and HeritabilityU54MH091657 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL, VAN ESSEN, DAVID C · 2010 to 2014
$34.7M
NEUROPSYCHIATRIC-MOLECULAR ASSOCIATIONS IN FRAGILE X SYNR01MH050047 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI REISS, ALLAN L · 1993 to 2022
$12.5M
Longitudinal MRI Study of Brain Development in Fragile XR01MH064708 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PIVEN, JOSEPH, REISS, ALLAN L · 2002 to 2016
$8.1M
TRAINING FOR CHILD PSYCHIATRY AND CHILD DEVELOPMENTT32MH019908 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI IAN H GOTLIB, DAVID S HONG · 1993 to 2026
$6.3M
Gene, Brain and Behavior in Turner SyndromeR01HD049653 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI REISS, ALLAN L · 2006 to 2016
$6.0M
Very-long Term Neurocognitive Outcomes in Breast Cancer Survivors (ProbC2)R01CA172145 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI KESLER, SHELLI R, PALESH, OXANA G · 2012 to 2024
$3.3M
Depression/Nutrition in Pediatric Sickle Cell DiseaseK01MH064078 · NIMH · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI MITCHELL, MONICA J · 2002 to 2006
$605k
Quantifying the Fluctuations of Intrinsic Brain Activity in Healthy and Patient PopulationsK99MH104605 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SAGGAR, MANISH · 2015 to 2016
$244k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA172145NICHD NIH HHS HD049653NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD049653NIMH NIH HHS 1U54MH091657NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH064078NIMH NIH HHS K99 MH104605NIMH NIH HHS K99-MH104605NIMH NIH HHS MH019908NIMH NIH HHS MH050047NIMH NIH HHS MH064078NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH050047NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH064708NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH019908NIMH NIH HHS T32-MH19908NIMH NIH HHS U54 MH091657
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coordinated variations in brain morphology (e.g., cortical thickness) across individuals have been widely used to infer large-scale population brain networks. These structural correlation networks (SCNs) have been shown to reflect synchronized maturational changes in connected brain regions. Further, evidence suggests that SCNs, to some extent, reflect both anatomical and functional connectivity and hence provide a complementary measure of brain connectivity in addition to diffusion weighted networks and resting-state functional networks. Although widely used to study between-group differences in network properties, SCNs are inferred only at the group-level using brain morphology data from a set of participants, thereby not providing any knowledge regarding how the observed differences in SCNs are associated with individual behavioral, cognitive and disorder states. In the present study, we introduce two novel distance-based approaches to extract information regarding individual differences from the group-level SCNs. We applied the proposed approaches to a moderately large dataset (n=100) consisting of individuals with fragile X syndrome (FXS; n=50) and age-matched typically developing individuals (TD; n=50). We tested the stability of proposed approaches using permutation analysis. Lastly, to test the efficacy of our method, individual contributions extracted from the group-level SCNs were examined for associations with intelligence scores and genetic data. The extracted individual contributions were stable and were significantly related to both genetic and intelligence estimates, in both typically developing individuals and participants with FXS. We anticipate that the approaches developed in this work could be used as a putative biomarker for altered connectivity in individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders.

Indexed as

Data Interpretation, StatisticalAdolescentAdultBrainChildFemaleFragile X SyndromeHumansIndividualityIntelligenceMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNerve NetYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26162553
PMCPMC4589508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.