Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26162421›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2016

Gastrointestinal symptoms, weight loss and patient satisfaction 5 years after gastric bypass: a study of three techniques for the gastrojejunal anastomosis.

E Sima, J Hedberg, M Sundbom

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E SimaDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. eduardo.sima@surgsci.uu.se.
J HedbergDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
M SundbomDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Uppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe optimal operative technique in gastric bypass (RYGB) is still under debate. We have studied patient-reported gastrointestinal symptoms and weight loss 5 years after RYGB performed with three different stapling techniques for the gastrojejunal anastomosis (GJ).

methodsOut of 593 patients operated with RYGB, 489 patients [80.2% women, body mass index (BMI) 44.9 (33-68) kg/m(2)] answered our 5-year follow-up questionnaire concerning gastrointestinal symptoms (vomiting, reflux, dumping, abdominal pain or diarrhea), weight loss, need for postoperative endoscopic interventions and overall satisfaction with the procedure. We compared the results for three different GJ techniques: linear stapler (LS, n = 103), 21-mm circular stapler (C21, n = 88) and 25-mm circular stapler (C25, n = 298).

resultsDumping was the most commonly reported symptom (14.1% of all patients on a weekly to daily basis), however, less frequently reported in the C25 group (p < 0.05). Vomiting, prevalent in 2.9% of all patients, was more frequently reported in the C21 group (p < 0.01). No group consistently showed greater weight loss compared to the other two groups. A higher incidence of endoscopic dilatations due to strictures was reported in the C21 group (12.5% compared to 4.5% of all patients, p < 0.05). Overall patient satisfaction was high (88%).

conclusionOur data suggest that the technique for the construction of the GJ in RYGB affects gastrointestinal symptoms 5 years postoperatively. The difference is moderate but indicates that a narrow GJ results in increased frequency of vomiting and need for endoscopic interventions without improving the weight result.

Indexed as

Gastric BypassPatient SatisfactionWeight LossAdultAnastomosis, SurgicalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleObesity, MorbidVomitingGastric bypassGastrointestinal symptomsGastrojejunostomyLong-term resultsStapling techniqueWeight loss

Identifiers

PMID26162421
OpenAlexW2170115864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.