ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2015
Fragile X Syndrome: Scientific Background and Screening Technologies.
Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Detection of FMR1 CGG Repeat Expansions Using Buccal Swab and Blood Samples of Children With Intellectual Disability in A Resource-Limited Country.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2025Article
- Beyond Repetition: The Role of Gray Zone Alleles in the Upregulation ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Social consequences and genetics for the child with overweight and obesity: An obesity medicine association (OMA) clinical practice statement 2022.Obesity pillars · 2022Article
- Validation of Fragile X Screening in the Newborn Population Using a Fit-for-Purpose FMR1 PCR Assay System.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2020Article
- Analysis of short tandem repeat expansions and their methylation state with nanopore sequencing.Nature biotechnology · 2019Article
- Study of patterns of inheritance of premature ovarian failure syndrome carrying maternal and paternal premutations.BMC medical genetics · 2018Article
- Tonotopic alterations in inhibitory input to the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body in a mouse model of Fragile X syndrome.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2017Article
- Assessing the Fragile X Syndrome Newborn Screening Landscape.Pediatrics · 2017Review
- Molecular Correlates and Recent Advancements in the Diagnosis and Screening of FMR1-Related Disorders.Genes · 2016Review
- Cascade Screening for Fragile X Syndrome/CGG Repeat Expansions in Children Attending Special Education in Sri Lanka.PloS one · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Fragile X is the most common inherited cause of mental retardation with a prevalence of 1 in 4000 for males and 1 in 5000 to 8000 for females. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics has recommended diagnostic testing for fragile X in symptomatic persons, women with ovarian dysfunction, and persons with tremor/ataxia syndrome. Although medical and scientific professionals do not currently recommend screening nonsymptomatic populations, improvements in current treatment approaches and ongoing clinical trials have generated growing interest in screening for fragile X. Here, we briefly review the relevant molecular basis of fragile X and fragile X testing and compare three different molecular technologies available for fragile X screening in both males and females. These technologic approaches include destabilizing the CGG-repeat region with betaine and using chimeric CGG-targeted PCR primers, using heat pulses to destabilize C-G bonds in the PCR extension step, and using melting curve analysis to differentiate expanded CGG repeats from normals. The first two-step method performed with high sensitivity and specificity. The second method provided agarose gel images that allow identification of males with expanded CGG repeats and females with expanded CGG-repeat bands which are sometimes faint. The third melting curve analysis method would require controls in each run to correct for shifting optimal cutoff values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.