Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26161513›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Enhanced Electrical Integration of Engineered Human Myocardium via Intramyocardial versus Epicardial Delivery in Infarcted Rat Hearts.

Kaytlyn A Gerbin, Xiulan Yang, Charles E Murry, Kareen L K Coulombe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Heart Regeneration for Clinical Application.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Injectable biodegradable microcarriers for iPSC expansion and cardiomyocyte differentiation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kaytlyn A GerbinCenter for Cardiovascular Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America; Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America; Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Xiulan YangCenter for Cardiovascular Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America; Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America; Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Charles E MurryCenter for Cardiovascular Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America; Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America; Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America; Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America; Department of Medicine/Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Kareen L K CoulombeCenter for Cardiovascular Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America; Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America; Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
University of Washington · US

Funding

Vector and Transgenic Mouse CoreP30DK017047 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Sakeneh Zraika · 1986 to 2026
$41.4M
Self Renewal and Differentiation of Human Embryonic Stem CellsP01GM081619 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI REH, THOMAS A · 2007 to 2017
$20.6M
Vascularization and Growth of Human Myocardial GraftsP01HL094374 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MINAMI, ELINA · 2010 to 2014
$14.5M
Expansion of cardiac and hematopoietic progenitors by Wnt and NotchU01HL100405 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI EPSTEIN, JONATHAN A., MORRISEY, EDWARD E · 2009 to 2015
$8.1M
Cell-Based Cardiac RepairR01HL084642 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MURRY, CHARLES E · 2007 to 2014
$4.9M
Bioengineering Cardiovascular Training GrantT32EB001650 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI REGNIER, MICHAEL · 2004 to 2019
$3.6M
Regenerating the Heart with Engineered Human Cardiac TissueR00HL115123 · NHLBI · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI COULOMBE, KAREEN LK · 2014 to 2016
$747k
Regenerating the Heart with Engineered Human Cardiac TissueK99HL115123 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI COULOMBE, KAREEN LK · 2012 to 2013
$144k
NHLBI NIH HHS K99 HL115123NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL094374NHLBI NIH HHS R00 HL115123NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL084642NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL100405NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB001650NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK017047NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM081619NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM81619
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac tissue engineering is a promising approach to provide large-scale tissues for transplantation to regenerate the heart after ischemic injury, however, integration with the host myocardium will be required to achieve electromechanical benefits. To test the ability of engineered heart tissues to electrically integrate with the host, 10 million human embryonic stem cell (hESC)-derived cardiomyocytes were used to form either scaffold-free tissue patches implanted on the epicardium or micro-tissue particles (~1000 cells/particle) delivered by intramyocardial injection into the left ventricular wall of the ischemia/reperfusion injured athymic rat heart. Results were compared to intramyocardial injection of 10 million dispersed hESC-cardiomyocytes. Graft size was not significantly different between treatment groups and correlated inversely with infarct size. After implantation on the epicardial surface, hESC-cardiac tissue patches were electromechanically active, but they beat slowly and were not electrically coupled to the host at 4 weeks based on ex vivo fluorescent imaging of their graft-autonomous GCaMP3 calcium reporter. Histologically, scar tissue physically separated the patch graft and host myocardium. In contrast, following intramyocardial injection of micro-tissue particles and suspended cardiomyocytes, 100% of the grafts detected by fluorescent GCaMP3 imaging were electrically coupled to the host heart at spontaneous rate and could follow host pacing up to a maximum of 300-390 beats per minute (5-6.5 Hz). Gap junctions between intramyocardial graft and host tissue were identified histologically. The extensive coupling and rapid response rate of the human myocardial grafts after intramyocardial delivery suggest electrophysiological adaptation of hESC-derived cardiomyocytes to the rat heart's pacemaking activity. These data support the use of the rat model for studying electromechanical integration of human cardiomyocytes, and they identify lack of electrical integration as a challenge to overcome in tissue engineered patches.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationAnimalsCells, CulturedConnexin 43ElectrocardiographyElectrophysiological PhenomenaEmbryonic Stem CellsGap JunctionsMaleMyocardial InfarctionMyocardiumMyocytes, CardiacPericardiumRats, NudeRats, Sprague-DawleyTissue EngineeringConnexin 43

Identifiers

PMID26161513
PMCPMC4498815
OpenAlexW797124415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.