ReviewFrontiers in surgery2015
Innovation in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Reparation - Initial Experiences with the Parietex Progrip Laparoscopic(™) - Mesh.
Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02781870 (Randomized Single-center Study on Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Repair by a 3D ENDOLAP Visible With and Without LiquiBand Fix 8 Mesh Fixation), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized Single-center Study on Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Repair by a 3D ENDOLAP Visible With and Without LiquiBand Fix 8 Mesh Fixation
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Influence of the learning curve on the immediate postoperative pain intensity after laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty.Medicine and pharmacy reports · 2023Article
- Article
- A new technique to avoid unintentional adhesion while deploying ProGrip mesh and its utility in the laparoscopic repair of obturator hernia.Journal of minimal access surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe Laparoscopic TAPP (transabdominal pre-peritoneal inguinal hernia repair) - technique is becoming more widely and frequently used due to higher patient satisfaction and lower rates of both relapse and complications. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe role of the fixation of the mesh is especially important in regard to the endoscopic technique. The fixation of mesh through penetrating techniques using staples, clips, or screws is associated with a significantly increased risk of developing a chronic post-herniotomy inguinal pain syndrome (CPIP). In order to answer the question "fixation or no fixation of the mesh," the use of self-adhesive mesh is an optimal compromise.
conclusionWith the authors own operative technique consisting also of a standard pre- and post-operative management, the self-adhesive mesh was proven to be extremely reliable. As no specific materials to fix the mesh were needed, the method was fast, simple, and economical. We could also reduce the incidences of chronic inguinal pain in our patient population by using the self-adhesive mesh, without the risk of an increased recurrence rate in the observation period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.