ArticlePersonalized medicine
Do physicians think genomic medicine will be useful for patient care?
Article in Personalized medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Revolutionising Cardio-Oncology Care with Precision Genomics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Using social media listening to understand barriers to genomic medicine for those living with Ehlers-Danlos syndromes and hypermobility spectrum disorders.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Article
- Genomic sequencing in oncology: Considerations for integration in routine cancer care.European journal of cancer care · 2022Article
- Precision Population Medicine in Primary Care: The Sanford Chip Experience.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- An Automated Functional Annotation Pipeline That Rapidly Prioritizes Clinically Relevant Genes for Autism Spectrum Disorder.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- "Balancing Expectations with Actual Realities": Conversations with Clinicians and Scientists in the First Year of a High-Risk Childhood Cancer Precision Medicine Trial.Journal of personalized medicine · 2020Article
- Physicians' perspectives on receiving unsolicited genomic results.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019Article
- Physician preparedness for big genomic data: a review of genomic medicine education initiatives in the United States.Human molecular genetics · 2018Review
- On the readiness of physicians for pharmacogenomics testing: an empirical assessment.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2018Article
- Prescriber Attitudes Toward Implementation of Pharmacogenomic Testing in a Family Medicine Residency Program.PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.) · 2018Article
- Clinical pharmacogenomics: patient perspectives of pharmacogenomic testing and the incidence of actionable test results in a chronic disease cohort.Personalized medicine · 2017Article
- Discussing molecular testing in oncology care: Comparing patient and physician information preferences.Cancer · 2017Article
- Physicians' attitudes toward pharmacogenetic testing before and after pharmacogenetic education.Personalized medicine · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Significant technological improvements over the last decade have led to a vast expansion in the understanding of the genomic architecture of human disease. However, the use of genomic information, so-called genomic medicine, in routine clinical care, has been slow in comparison to the growth in genomic discovery. The uptake of genomic technology into clinical practice will depend on physicians' perspectives of its utility in patient care. We review recent literature addressing physician attitudes regarding the usefulness and limitations of genomic testing. We conclude by proposing research areas to better understand the role physicians will play in the uptake of genomic information into clinical medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.