Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26160980›Full record

ArticleAnimal behaviour2015

Brains, brawn and sociality: a hyaena's tale.

Kay E Holekamp, Ben Dantzer, Gregory Stricker, Kathryn C Shaw Yoshida, Sarah Benson-Amram

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal behaviour, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
12.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Problem Solving in Animals: Proposal for an Ontogenetic Perspective.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. The evolution of matrilineal social systems in fissiped carnivores.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  8. An evolutionary perspective on paranoia.Nature human behaviour · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Lions, hyenas and mobs (oh my!).Current zoology · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Brain size predicts problem-solving ability in mammalian carnivores.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Geographic differences in individual recognition linked with social but not nonsocial cognition.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kay E HolekampEcology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, U.S.A ; BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, U.S.A.
Ben DantzerDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, U.S.A ; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, U.S.A.
Gregory StrickerEcology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, U.S.A.
Kathryn C Shaw YoshidaLas Vegas Natural History Museum, Las Vegas, NV, U.S.A.
Sarah Benson-AmramDepartment of Zoology and Physiology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, U.S.A ; Program in Ecology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, U.S.A.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Wyoming · US

Funding

The Role of Emotion and Communication in Cooperative BehaviorR01GM105042 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI MIIKKULAINEN, RISTO · 2013 to 2015
$929k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM105042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theoretically intelligence should evolve to help animals solve specific types of problems posed by the environment, but it remains unclear how environmental complexity or novelty facilitates the evolutionary enhancement of cognitive abilities, or whether domain-general intelligence can evolve in response to domain-specific selection pressures. The social complexity hypothesis, which posits that intelligence evolved to cope with the labile behaviour of conspecific group-mates, has been strongly supported by work on the sociocognitive abilities of primates and other animals. Here we review the remarkable convergence in social complexity between cercopithecine primates and spotted hyaenas, and describe our tests of predictions of the social complexity hypothesis in regard to both cognition and brain size in hyaenas. Behavioural data indicate that there has been remarkable convergence between primates and hyaenas with respect to their abilities in the domain of social cognition. Furthermore, within the family Hyaenidae, our data suggest that social complexity might have contributed to enlargement of the frontal cortex. However, social complexity failed to predict either brain volume or frontal cortex volume in a larger array of mammalian carnivores. To address the question of whether or not social complexity might be able to explain the evolution of domain-general intelligence as well as social cognition in particular, we presented simple puzzle boxes, baited with food and scaled to accommodate body size, to members of 39 carnivore species housed in zoos and found that species with larger brains relative to their body mass were more innovative and more successful at opening the boxes. However, social complexity failed to predict success in solving this problem. Overall our work suggests that, although social complexity enhances social cognition, there are no unambiguous causal links between social complexity and either brain size or performance in problem-solving tasks outside the social domain in mammalian carnivores.

Indexed as

brain sizecarnivorecognitionhyaenaintelligenceproblem solvingsocial complexityzoo

Identifiers

PMID26160980
PMCPMC4493912
OpenAlexW2063466424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.