Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26160961›Full record

ArticleStem cells translational medicine2015

Improving the Post-Stroke Therapeutic Potency of Mesenchymal Multipotent Stromal Cells by Cocultivation With Cortical Neurons: The Role of Crosstalk Between Cells.

Valentina A Babenko, Denis N Silachev, Ljubava D Zorova, Irina B Pevzner, Anastasia A Khutornenko, Egor Y Plotnikov, Gennady T Sukhikh, Dmitry B Zorov

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells translational medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Valentina A BabenkoFaculty of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, A.N. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, and International Laser Center, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation; Gynecology and Perinatology, Research Center of Obstetrics, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Denis N SilachevFaculty of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, A.N. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, and International Laser Center, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation; Gynecology and Perinatology, Research Center of Obstetrics, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Ljubava D ZorovaFaculty of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, A.N. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, and International Laser Center, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation; Gynecology and Perinatology, Research Center of Obstetrics, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Irina B PevznerFaculty of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, A.N. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, and International Laser Center, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation; Gynecology and Perinatology, Research Center of Obstetrics, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Anastasia A KhutornenkoFaculty of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, A.N. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, and International Laser Center, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation; Gynecology and Perinatology, Research Center of Obstetrics, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Egor Y PlotnikovFaculty of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, A.N. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, and International Laser Center, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation; Gynecology and Perinatology, Research Center of Obstetrics, Moscow, Russian Federation plotnikov@genebee.msu.ru zorov@genebee.msu.su.
Gennady T SukhikhFaculty of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, A.N. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, and International Laser Center, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation; Gynecology and Perinatology, Research Center of Obstetrics, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Dmitry B ZorovFaculty of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, A.N. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, and International Laser Center, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation; Gynecology and Perinatology, Research Center of Obstetrics, Moscow, Russian Federation plotnikov@genebee.msu.ru zorov@genebee.msu.su.
Lomonosov Moscow State University · RUNational Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I.Kulakov of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledThe goal of the present study was to maximally alleviate the negative impact of stroke by increasing the therapeutic potency of injected mesenchymal multipotent stromal cells (MMSCs). To pursue this goal, the intercellular communications of MMSCs and neuronal cells were studied in vitro. As a result of cocultivation of MMSCs and rat cortical neurons, we proved the existence of intercellular contacts providing transfer of cellular contents from one cell to another. We present evidence of intercellular exchange with fluorescent probes specifically occupied by cytosol with preferential transfer from neurons toward MMSCs. In contrast, we observed a reversed transfer of mitochondria (from MMSCs to neural cells). Intravenous injection of MMSCs in a postischemic period alleviated the pathological indexes of a stroke, expressed as a lower infarct volume in the brain and partial restoration of neurological status. Also, MMSCs after cocultivation with neurons demonstrated more profound neuroprotective effects than did unprimed MMSCs. The production of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor was slightly increased in MMSCs, and the factor itself was redistributed in these cells after cocultivation. The level of Miro1 responsible for intercellular traffic of mitochondria was increased in MMSCs after cocultivation. We conclude that the exchange by cellular compartments between neural and stem cells improves MMSCs' protective abilities for better rehabilitation after stroke. This could be used as an approach to enhance the therapeutic benefits of stem cell therapy to the damaged brain. SIGNIFICANCE: The idea of priming stem cells before practical use for clinical purposes was applied. Thus, cells were preconditioned by coculturing them with the targeted cells (i.e., neurons for the treatment of brain pathological features) before the transfusion of stem cells to the organism. Such priming improved the capacity of stem cells to treat stroke. Some additional minimal study will be required to develop a detailed protocol for coculturing followed by cell separation.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationAnimalsAnimals, Outbred StrainsBiological TransportBrain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorBrain IschemiaCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyCell CommunicationCell SeparationCerebral CortexCoculture TechniquesGene ExpressionMaleMesenchymal Stem CellsMitochondriaMitochondrial ProteinsBrain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorMitochondrial Proteinsrho GTP-Binding ProteinsRhot1 protein, ratAstrocytesIntercellular communicationIschemiaMitochondriaNeuronsStem cell therapyStroke

Identifiers

PMID26160961
PMCPMC4542870
OpenAlexW2102503359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.