Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26160880›Full record

Trial reportHaematologica2015

Panobinostat as part of induction and maintenance for elderly patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: phase Ib/II panobidara study.

Enrique M Ocio, Pilar Herrera, María-Teresa Olave, Nerea Castro, José A Pérez-Simón, Salut Brunet, Albert Oriol, Marta Mateo, Miguel-Ángel Sanz, Javier López and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Haematologica, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Molecularly targeted therapy and immunotherapy in leukemias.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Molecular targeting in acute myeloid leukemia.Journal of translational medicine · 2017
    Review
  19. Emerging therapies for acute myeloid leukemia.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2017
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Enrique M OcioComplejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca (IBSAL), Centro Investigación del Cáncer-IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), Salamanca emocio@usal.es.
Pilar HerreraHospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid.
María-Teresa OlaveHospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza.
Nerea CastroHospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid.
José A Pérez-SimónHospital Virgen del Rocío, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBIS), Seville.
Salut BrunetHospital de la Santa Creu y Sant Pau, Barcelona.
Albert OriolHospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona.
Marta MateoHospital San Carlos, Madrid.
Miguel-Ángel SanzHospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia.
Javier LópezHospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid.
Pau MontesinosHospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia.
María-Carmen ChillónComplejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca (IBSAL), Centro Investigación del Cáncer-IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), Salamanca.
María-Isabel Prieto-CondeComplejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca (IBSAL), Centro Investigación del Cáncer-IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), Salamanca.
María Díez-CampeloComplejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca (IBSAL), Centro Investigación del Cáncer-IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), Salamanca.
Marcos GonzálezComplejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca (IBSAL), Centro Investigación del Cáncer-IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), Salamanca.
María-Belén VidrialesComplejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca (IBSAL), Centro Investigación del Cáncer-IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), Salamanca.
María-Victoria MateosComplejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca (IBSAL), Centro Investigación del Cáncer-IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), Salamanca.
Jesús F San MiguelClínica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigaciones Médicas Aplicadas (CIMA), IDISNA, Pamplona, Spain.
PETHEMA Group
Centro de Investigación del Cáncer · ESComplejo Hospitalario de Salamanca · ESHospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ESHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal · ESClinica Universidad de Navarra · ESHospital Clínico San Carlos · ESHospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa · ESHospital de Sant Pau · ESHospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol · ESHospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESInstituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla · ESInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This phase Ib/II trial combined the pan-deacetylase inhibitor panobinostat with chemotherapy followed by panobinostat maintenance in elderly patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. Patients with prior history of myelodysplastic syndrome were excluded and 38 evaluable patients were included in the study (median age: 71 years; range: 65-83). Study patients received an induction with idarubicin (8 mg/m(2) iv days 1-3) plus cytarabine (100 mg/m(2) iv days 1-7) plus panobinostat po at escalating doses (days 8, 10, 12, 15, 17 and 19) that could be repeated in non-responding patients. Patients achieving complete remission received a consolidation cycle with the same schema, followed by panobinostat maintenance (40 mg po 3 days/week) every other week until progression. Thirty-one patients were treated at the maximum tolerated dose of panobinostat in the combination (10 mg) with good tolerability. Complete remission rate was 64% with a time to relapse of 17.0 months (12.8-21.1). Median overall survival for the whole series was 17 months (5.5-28.4). Moreover, in 4 of 5 patients with persistent minimal residual disease before maintenance, panobinostat monotherapy reduced its levels, with complete negativization in two of them. Maintenance phase was well tolerated. The most frequent adverse events were thrombocytopenia (25% grades 3/4), and gastrointestinal toxicity, asthenia and anorexia (mainly grades 1/2). Five patients required dose reduction during this phase, but only one discontinued therapy due to toxicity. These results suggest that panobinostat is one of the first novel agents with activity in elderly acute myeloid leukemia patients, and suggest further investigation is warranted, particularly in the context of maintenance therapy. This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov identifier: 00840346.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCytarabineFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHydroxamic AcidsIdarubicinIndolesInduction ChemotherapyLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaintenance ChemotherapyMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseCytarabineHydroxamic AcidsIdarubicinIndolesPanobinostat

Identifiers

PMID26160880
PMCPMC4591761
OpenAlexW1955662634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.