Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26160877›Full record

ArticleHaematologica2015

Large registry analysis to accurately define second malignancy rates and risks in a well-characterized cohort of 744 consecutive multiple myeloma patients followed-up for 25 years.

Monika Engelhardt, Gabriele Ihorst, Ola Landgren, Milena Pantic, Heike Reinhardt, Johannes Waldschmidt, Annette M May, Martin Schumacher, Martina Kleber, Ralph Wäsch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Haematologica, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Monika EngelhardtDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Germany monika.engelhardt@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
Gabriele IhorstCenter of Clinical Trials, University Medical Center Freiburg, Germany.
Ola LandgrenMyeloma Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Milena PanticDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Germany.
Heike ReinhardtDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Germany.
Johannes WaldschmidtDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Germany.
Annette M MayPathology Department, University of Freiburg, Germany.
Martin SchumacherDepartment of Medical Biometry and Statistics (IMBI), University of Freiburg, Germany.
Martina KleberDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Germany.
Ralph WäschDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Germany.
University of Freiburg · DEUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DEMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Additional malignancies in multiple myeloma patients after first-line and maintenance treatment have been observed, questioning whether specific risks exist. Second primary malignancies have also gained attention since randomized data showed associations to newer drugs. We have conducted this large registry analysis in 744 consecutive patients and analyzed: 1) frequency and onset of additional malignancies; and 2) second primary malignancy- and myeloma-specific risks. We assessed the frequency of additional malignancies in terms of host-, myeloma- and treatment-specific characteristics. To compare these risks, we estimated cumulative incidence rates for second malignancies and myeloma with Fine and Gray regression models taking into account competing risks. Additional malignancies were found in 118 patients: prior or synchronous malignancies in 63% and subsequent in 37%. Cumulative incidence rates for second malignancies were increased in IgG-myeloma and decreased in bortezomib-treated patients (P<0.05). Cumulative incidence rates for myeloma death were increased with higher stage and age, but decreased in IgG-subtypes and due to anti-myeloma treatment (P<0.05). Cytogenetics in patients acquiring second primary malignancies were predominantly favorable, suggesting that indolent myeloma and long disease latency may allow the manifestation of additional malignancies. An assessment of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result Program of the National Cancer Institute and our data with long-term follow up of 25 years confirmed a prevalence of second malignancy of 10% at 25 years, whereas death from myeloma decreased from 90% to 83%, respectively. Our important findings widen our knowledge of second malignancies and show that they are of increasing relevance as the prognosis in myeloma improves and mortality rates decrease.

Indexed as

RiskAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDatabases, FactualFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedMultiple MyelomaNeoplasms, Second PrimaryRadiotherapyRegistriesSEER Program

Identifiers

PMID26160877
PMCPMC4591767
OpenAlexW1817958071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.