ArticleQualitative health research2016
Beyond Adherence: Health Care Disparities and the Struggle to Get Screened for Colon Cancer.
Article in Qualitative health research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Support needs of young people caring for their parents with cancer.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- How are mental representations of asthma triggers and symptoms related to interpersonal risk perceptions? A psychometric investigation of caregivers of children with asthma.Psychology & health · 2025Article
- Inequities in childhood cancer research: A scoping review.EJC paediatric oncology · 2024Article
- Neighborhood homicide rate and odds of colorectal adenoma among adult patients seeking colonoscopy.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2024Article
- Urban vs. rural: colorectal cancer survival and prognostic disparities from 2000 to 2019.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Perceived economic pressure and colorectal cancer-related perceptions among U.S. males (aged 45-75).Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2023Article
- Direct Observation Methods: a Practical Guide for Health Researchers.PEC innovation · 2022Article
- Cancer disparities related to poverty and rurality for 22 top cancers in Florida.Preventive medicine reports · 2022Article
- Examining the relationship between household wealth and colorectal cancer screening behaviors among U.S. men aged 45-75.SSM - population health · 2022Article
- Cancer Screening Prevalence and Associated Factors Among US Adults.Preventing chronic disease · 2022Article
- Situating household management of children's asthma in the context of social, economic, and environmental injustice.The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma · 2022Article
- Development of a Credible Virtual Clinician Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening via Telehealth Apps for and by Black Men: Qualitative Study.JMIR formative research · 2021Article
- Current measures are not sufficient: an interview-based qualitative assessment of quality of life in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.The British journal of dermatology · 2021Article
- Translating Cancer Risk Prediction Models into Personalized Cancer Risk Assessment Tools: Stumbling Blocks and Strategies for Success.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020Article
- Using photovoice to understand the context of cervical cancer screening for underserved communities in rural India.Global health promotion · 2020Article
- Waiting for care: Chronic illness and health system uncertainties in the United States.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2020Article
- Colorectal cancer screening: Understanding the health literacy needs of hispanic rural residents.AIMS public health · 2019Article
- Examining the Interrelations Among Objective and Subjective Health Literacy and Numeracy and Their Associations with Health Knowledge.Journal of general internal medicine · 2018Article
- Side Effect Perceptions and Their Impact on Treatment Decisions in Women.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2017Article
- What is a good medical decision? A research agenda guided by perspectives from multiple stakeholders.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dominant health care professional discourses on cancer take for granted high levels of individual responsibility in cancer prevention, especially in expectations about preventive screening. At the same time, adhering to screening guidelines can be difficult for lower income and under-insured individuals. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a prime example. Since the advent of CRC screening, disparities in CRC mortality have widened along lines of income, insurance, and race in the United States. We used a community-engaged research method, Photovoice, to examine how people from medically under-served areas experienced and gave meaning to CRC screening. In our analysis, we first discuss ways in which participants recounted screening as a struggle. Second, we highlight a category that participants suggested was key to successful screening: social connections. Finally, we identify screening as an emotionally laden process that is underpinned by feelings of uncertainty, guilt, fear, and relief. We discuss the importance of these findings to research and practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.