Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26160752›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2016

Changing risk of environmental Campylobacter exposure with emerging poultry production systems in Ethiopia.

M C Brena, Y Mekonnen, J M Bettridge, N J Williams, P Wigley, T Sisay Tessema, R M Christley

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 94% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Adaptation of a Commercial Qualitative BAXFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Molecular Survey and Identification ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2022
    Article
  8. Identification and Characterization ofFrontiers in public health · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

M C BrenaInstitute of Infection and Global Health,University of Liverpool,Leahurst Campus,Cheshire,UK.
Y MekonnenCollege of Veterinary Medicine and Agriculture,Addis Ababa University,Debre Zeit,Ethiopia.
J M BettridgeInstitute of Infection and Global Health,University of Liverpool,Leahurst Campus,Cheshire,UK.
N J WilliamsInstitute of Infection and Global Health,University of Liverpool,Leahurst Campus,Cheshire,UK.
P WigleyInstitute of Infection and Global Health,University of Liverpool,Leahurst Campus,Cheshire,UK.
T Sisay TessemaInstitute of Biotechnology,Addis Ababa University,Addis Ababa,Ethiopia.
R M ChristleyInstitute of Infection and Global Health,University of Liverpool,Leahurst Campus,Cheshire,UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9250-3032
University of Liverpool · GBAddis Ababa University · ET

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H009396/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Campylobacter is a leading cause of diarrhoea, and its presence in chickens is a significant risk for zoonotic infection. Poultry production is becoming increasingly intensive in Ethiopia and is incorporating more high-producing breeds into traditionally managed smallholdings, especially in peri-urban areas. This cross-sectional study sampled 219 household environments in one peri-urban and two rural areas of Ethiopia, and an additional 20 semi-intensive farms in the peri-urban district. Campylobacter was detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-specific assays in 44 samples; 16 of which could be identified as C. jejuni. Flocks in the peri-urban area were at significantly greater odds of detection, including those which only kept indigenous birds under a scavenging system. It was also noted that scavenging flocks of exotic high-production birds (Rhode Island Red) were at slightly greater risk, perhaps as exotic birds are under more stress when kept under traditional management systems. We suggest that changes to the system of chicken production may alter the ecology and epidemiology of Campylobacter in the environment, chickens and people, which may drive emergence of new epidemiological patterns of disease. Further research is needed to determine the extent to which the current management intensification and the distribution programmes of exotic and/or improved indigenous birds may alter Campylobacter epidemiology, ecology and public health risk, before their widespread adoption.

Indexed as

Environmental ExposureEnvironmental MicrobiologyAnimal HusbandryAnimalsCampylobacterCampylobacter InfectionsCampylobacter jejuniChickensCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaPolymerase Chain ReactionPoultry DiseasesPrevalenceRural HealthSuburban HealthAnimal husbandryCampylobacterchickensEthiopiasocial changezoonoses

Identifiers

PMID26160752
PMCPMC4714298
OpenAlexW2137635173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.