Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26160651›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2015

Evaluation of BLAST-based edge-weighting metrics used for homology inference with the Markov Clustering algorithm.

Theodore R Gibbons, Stephen M Mount, Endymion D Cooper, Charles F Delwiche

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. An integrated culturomic and genomic database and analysis platform for methanogenic archaea.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genome analysis of a plasmid-bearing myxobacterimFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. panX: pan-genome analysis and exploration.Nucleic acids research · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Theodore R GibbonsDepartment of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, Baltimore, 20742, Maryland. trgibbons@gmail.com.
Stephen M MountDepartment of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, Baltimore, 20742, Maryland. smount@umd.edu.
Endymion D CooperDepartment of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, Baltimore, 20742, Maryland. endymion.dante.cooper@gmail.com.
Charles F DelwicheDepartment of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, Baltimore, 20742, Maryland. delwiche@umd.edu.

Funding

Training Program in Cell & Molecular BiologyT32GM080201 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI DELWICHE, CHARLES F · 2009 to 2019
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM080201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClustering protein sequences according to inferred homology is a fundamental step in the analysis of many large data sets. Since the publication of the Markov Clustering (MCL) algorithm in 2002, it has been the centerpiece of several popular applications. Each of these approaches generates an undirected graph that represents sequences as nodes connected to each other by edges weighted with a BLAST-based metric. MCL is then used to infer clusters of homologous proteins by analyzing these graphs. The various approaches differ only by how they weight the edges, yet there has been very little direct examination of the relative performance of alternative edge-weighting metrics. This study compares the performance of four BLAST-based edge-weighting metrics: the bit score, bit score ratio (BSR), bit score over anchored length (BAL), and negative common log of the expectation value (NLE). Performance is tested using the Extended CEGMA KOGs (ECK) database, which we introduce here.

resultsAll metrics performed similarly when analyzing full-length sequences, but dramatic differences emerged as progressively larger fractions of the test sequences were split into fragments. The BSR and BAL successfully rescued subsets of clusters by strengthening certain types of alignments between fragmented sequences, but also shifted the largest correct scores down near the range of scores generated from spurious alignments. This penalty outweighed the benefits in most test cases, and was greatly exacerbated by increasing the MCL inflation parameter, making these metrics less robust than the bit score or the more popular NLE. Notably, the bit score performed as well or better than the other three metrics in all scenarios.

conclusionsThe results provide a strong case for use of the bit score, which appears to offer equivalent or superior performance to the more popular NLE. The insight that MCL-based clustering methods can be improved using a more tractable edge-weighting metric will greatly simplify future implementations. We demonstrate this with our own minimalist Python implementation: Porthos, which uses only standard libraries and can process a graph with 25 m + edges connecting the 60 k + KOG sequences in half a minute using less than half a gigabyte of memory.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCluster AnalysisMarkov ChainsAmino Acid SequenceComputational BiologyDatabases, FactualHumansMolecular Sequence DataProteinsSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, ProteinSequence Homology, Amino AcidSoftwareProteins

Identifiers

PMID26160651
PMCPMC4496851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.