Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26159766›Full record

SynthesisCulture, health & sexuality2015

Challenging gender inequity through male involvement in maternal and newborn health: critical assessment of an emerging evidence base.

Liz Comrie-Thomson, Mariam Tokhi, Frances Ampt, Anayda Portela, Matthew Chersich, Renu Khanna, Stanley Luchters

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Culture, health & sexuality, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
12.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 135 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Couple Relationships and Interaction During Pregnancy: A Comprehensive Review of Key Relational Dynamics.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Liz Comrie-Thomsona Centre for International Health , Burnet Institute , Melbourne , Australia.
Mariam Tokhia Centre for International Health , Burnet Institute , Melbourne , Australia.
Frances Ampta Centre for International Health , Burnet Institute , Melbourne , Australia.
Anayda Portelab Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health , World Health Organization , Geneva , Switzerland.
Matthew Chersichc Faculty of Health Sciences , Centre for Health Policy, University of Witwatersrand , Johannesburg , South Africa.
Renu Khannae Society for Health Alternatives , Gujarat , India.
Stanley Luchtersa Centre for International Health , Burnet Institute , Melbourne , Australia.
Burnet Institute · AUMonash University · AUUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZAWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Men's involvement in the health of women and children is considered an important avenue for addressing gender influences on maternal and newborn health. The impact of male involvement around the time of childbirth on maternal and newborn health outcomes was examined as one part of a systematic review of maternal health intervention studies published between 2000 and 2012. Of 33,888 articles screened, 13 eligible studies relating to male involvement were identified. The interventions documented in these studies comprise an emerging evidence base for male involvement in maternal and newborn health. We conducted a secondary qualitative analysis of the 13 studies, reviewing content that had been systematically extracted. A critical assessment of this extracted content finds important gaps in the evidence base, which are likely to limit how 'male involvement' is understood and implemented in maternal and newborn health policy, programmes and research. Collectively, the studies point to the need for an evidence base that includes studies that clearly articulate and document the gender-transformative potential of involving men. This broader evidence base could support the use of male involvement as a strategy to improve both health and gender equity outcomes.

Indexed as

Gender IdentityInfant HealthMaternal HealthFathersFemaleHealth PromotionHumansInfant, NewbornPerinatal CarePregnancyQualitative Researchmale engagementmale involvementmaternal healthnewborn health

Identifiers

PMID26159766
PMCPMC4706017
OpenAlexW2140169484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.