Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26159710›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2015

Sun Safety at Work Canada: a multiple case-study protocol to develop sun safety and heat protection programs and policies for outdoor workers.

Desre M Kramer, Thomas Tenkate, Peter Strahlendorf, Rivka Kushner, Audrey Gardner, D Linn Holness

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Tailored Sun Safety Messages for Outdoor Workers.Safety and health at work · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Burden of non-melanoma skin cancer attributable to occupational sun exposure in Canada.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Desre M KramerOccupational Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Care Ontario, 3rd floor, 525 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X3, Canada. Desre.kramer@occupationalcancer.ca.
Thomas TenkateSchool of Occupational and Public and Health, Ryerson University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 2K3, Canada.
Peter StrahlendorfSchool of Occupational and Public and Health, Ryerson University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 2K3, Canada.
Rivka KushnerOccupational Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Care Ontario, 3rd floor, 525 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X3, Canada.
Audrey GardnerSchool of Occupational and Public and Health, Ryerson University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 2K3, Canada.
D Linn HolnessSt Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond St., Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada.
Toronto Metropolitan University · CACancer Care Ontario · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCAREX Canada has identified solar ultraviolet radiation (UV) as the second most prominent carcinogenic exposure in Canada, and over 75 % of Canadian outdoor workers fall within the highest exposure category. Heat stress also presents an important public health issue, particularly for outdoor workers. The most serious form of heat stress is heat stroke, which can cause irreversible damage to the heart, lungs, kidneys, and liver. Although the need for sun and heat protection has been identified, there is no Canada-wide heat and sun safety program for outdoor workers. Further, no prevention programs have addressed both skin cancer prevention and heat stress in an integrated approach. The aim of this partnered study is to evaluate whether a multi-implementation, multi-evaluation approach can help develop sustainable workplace-specific programs, policies, and procedures to increase the use of UV safety and heat protection. METHODS/

designThis 2-year study is a theory-driven, multi-site, non-randomized study design with a cross-case analysis of 13 workplaces across four provinces in Canada. The first phase of the study includes the development of workplace-specific programs with the support of the intensive engagement of knowledge brokers. There will be a three-points-in-time evaluation with process and impact components involving the occupational health and safety (OHS) director, management, and workers with the goal of measuring changes in workplace policies, procedures, and practices. It will use mixed methods involving semi-structured key informant interviews, focus groups, surveys, site observations, and UV dosimetry assessment. Using the findings from phase I, in phase 2, a web-based, interactive, intervention planning tool for workplaces will be developed, as will the intensive engagement of intermediaries such as industry decision-makers to link to policymakers about the importance of heat and sun safety for outdoor workers. DISCUSSION: Solar UV and heat are both health and safety hazards. Using an occupational health and safety risk assessment and control framework, Sun Safety at Work Canada will support workplaces to assess their exposure risks, implement control strategies that build on their existing programs, and embed the controls into their existing occupational health and safety system.

Indexed as

Occupational HealthCanadaHealth PolicyHeat StrokeHumansOccupational ExposureOrganizational Case StudiesProgram DevelopmentProtective ClothingSunstrokeWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID26159710
PMCPMC4702388
OpenAlexW1589141810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.