ArticleBMC genomics2015
Mobile element insertions are frequent in oesophageal adenocarcinomas and can mislead paired-end sequencing analysis.
Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- De Novo Genome Assemblies of Four Rainbow Trout Genetic Lines Reveal Structural Variants in Pursuit of a Pangenome Reference.Molecular ecology resources · 2026Article
- Global Hypomethylation as Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Biomarker in Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Adenocarcinoma.Cancers · 2025Article
- Sequencing and Optical Genome Mapping for the Adventurous Chemist.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2024Review
- Locus-resolution analysis of L1 regulation and retrotransposition potential in mouse embryonic development.Genome research · 2023Article
- Unraveling the features of somatic transposition in the Drosophila intestine.The EMBO journal · 2021Article
- NRG1 fusions in breast cancer.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2021Article
- L1 retrotransposition is a common feature of mammalian hepatocarcinogenesis.Genome research · 2018Article
- Genome-Wide Analysis of Interchromosomal Interaction Probabilities Reveals Chained Translocations and Overrepresentation of Translocation Breakpoints in Genes in a Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Cell Line.Frontiers in oncology · 2018Article
- L1 retrotransposition in the soma: a field jumping ahead.Mobile DNA · 2018Review
- The Evolving Genomic Landscape of Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.Gastroenterology · 2017Review
- Review
- Mutational signatures in esophageal adenocarcinoma define etiologically distinct subgroups with therapeutic relevance.Nature genetics · 2016Article
- Next-generation sequencing-based detection of germline L1-mediated transductions.BMC genomics · 2016Article
- Activation of individual L1 retrotransposon instances is restricted to cell-type dependent permissive loci.eLife · 2016Article
- Ampullary Cancers Harbor ELF3 Tumor Suppressor Gene Mutations and Exhibit Frequent WNT Dysregulation.Cell reports · 2016Article
- Widespread somatic L1 retrotransposition occurs early during gastrointestinal cancer evolution.Genome research · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMobile elements are active in the human genome, both in the germline and cancers, where they can mutate driver genes.
resultsWhile analysing whole genome paired-end sequencing of oesophageal adenocarcinomas to find genomic rearrangements, we identified three ways in which new mobile element insertions appear in the data, resembling translocation or insertion junctions: inserts where unique sequence has been transduced by an L1 (Long interspersed element 1) mobile element; novel inserts that are confidently, but often incorrectly, mapped by alignment software to L1s or polyA tracts in the reference sequence; and a combination of these two ways, where different sequences within one insert are mapped to different loci. We identified nine unique sequences that were transduced by neighbouring L1s, both L1s in the reference genome and L1s not present in the reference. Many of the resulting inserts were small fragments that include little or no recognisable mobile element sequence. We found 6 loci in the reference genome to which sequence reads from inserts were frequently mapped, probably erroneously, by alignment software: these were either L1 sequence or particularly long polyA runs. Inserts identified from such apparent rearrangement junctions averaged 16 inserts/tumour, range 0-153 insertions in 43 tumours. However, many inserts would not be detected by mapping the sequences to the reference genome, because they do not include sufficient mappable sequence. To estimate total somatic inserts we searched for polyA sequences that were not present in the matched normal or other normals from the same tumour batch, and were not associated with known polymorphisms. Samples of these candidate inserts were verified by sequencing across them or manual inspection of surrounding reads: at least 85 % were somatic and resembled L1-mediated events, most including L1Hs sequence. Approximately 100 such inserts were detected per tumour on average (range zero to approximately 700).
conclusionsSomatic mobile elements insertions are abundant in these tumours, with over 75 % of cases having a number of novel inserts detected. The inserts create a variety of problems for the interpretation of paired-end sequencing data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.