Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26159465›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2015

WebDISCO: a web service for distributed cox model learning without patient-level data sharing.

Chia-Lun Lu, Shuang Wang, Zhanglong Ji, Yuan Wu, Li Xiong, Xiaoqian Jiang, Lucila Ohno-Machado

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Learning competing risks across multiple hospitals: one-shot distributed algorithms.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Centralized and Federated Models for the Analysis of Clinical Data.Annual review of biomedical data science · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chia-Lun LuDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA Email: challen@ucsd.edu, shw070@ucsd.edu, z1ji@ucsd.edu, x1jiang@ucsd.edu, machado@ucsd.edu.
Shuang WangDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA Email: challen@ucsd.edu, shw070@ucsd.edu, z1ji@ucsd.edu, x1jiang@ucsd.edu, machado@ucsd.edu shw070@ucsd.edu x1jiang@ucsd.edu.
Zhanglong JiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA Email: challen@ucsd.edu, shw070@ucsd.edu, z1ji@ucsd.edu, x1jiang@ucsd.edu, machado@ucsd.edu.
Yuan WuDepartment of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA Email: yuan.wu@duke.edu.
Li XiongDepartment of Mathematics & Computer Science, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA Email: challen@ucsd.edu, shw070@ucsd.edu, z1ji@ucsd.edu, x1jiang@ucsd.edu, machado@ucsd.edu.
Xiaoqian JiangDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA Email: challen@ucsd.edu, shw070@ucsd.edu, z1ji@ucsd.edu, x1jiang@ucsd.edu, machado@ucsd.edu Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA Email: challen@ucsd.edu, shw070@ucsd.edu, z1ji@ucsd.edu, x1jiang@ucsd.edu, machado@ucsd.edu.
Lucila Ohno-MachadoDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA Email: challen@ucsd.edu, shw070@ucsd.edu, z1ji@ucsd.edu, x1jiang@ucsd.edu, machado@ucsd.edu.

Funding

iDASH: Integrating Data for Analysis, Anonymization, and SharingU54HL108460 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI OHNO-MACHADO, LUCILA · 2010 to 2015
$19.1M
SHARE: Statistical Health Information Release with Differential PrivacyR01GM114612 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI XIONG, LI · 2015 to 2017
$1.0M
Protection of Records: Privacy (PReP) Technology for Medical ResearchR00LM011392 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI JIANG, XIAOQIAN · 2013 to 2015
$650k
Protect Privacy of Healthcare Data in the CloudR21LM012060 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI JIANG, XIAOQIAN · 2014 to 2015
$376k
Protecting the pRivacy Of Genomes in Research StudieS (PROGRESS)K99HG008175 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI WANG, SHUANG · 2014 to 2015
$100k
NHGRI NIH HHS K99 HG008175NHGRI NIH HHS K99HG008175NHLBI NIH HHS U54 HL108460NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM114612NLM NIH HHS R00 LM011392NLM NIH HHS R00LM011392NLM NIH HHS R21LM012060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe Cox proportional hazards model is a widely used method for analyzing survival data. To achieve sufficient statistical power in a survival analysis, it usually requires a large amount of data. Data sharing across institutions could be a potential workaround for providing this added power. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The authors develop a web service for distributed Cox model learning (WebDISCO), which focuses on the proof-of-concept and algorithm development for federated survival analysis. The sensitive patient-level data can be processed locally and only the less-sensitive intermediate statistics are exchanged to build a global Cox model. Mathematical derivation shows that the proposed distributed algorithm is identical to the centralized Cox model.

resultsThe authors evaluated the proposed framework at the University of California, San Diego (UCSD), Emory, and Duke. The experimental results show that both distributed and centralized models result in near-identical model coefficients with differences in the range [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text]. The results confirm the mathematical derivation and show that the implementation of the distributed model can achieve the same results as the centralized implementation. LIMITATION: The proposed method serves as a proof of concept, in which a publicly available dataset was used to evaluate the performance. The authors do not intend to suggest that this method can resolve policy and engineering issues related to the federated use of institutional data, but they should serve as evidence of the technical feasibility of the proposed approach.Conclusions WebDISCO (Web-based Distributed Cox Regression Model; https://webdisco.ucsd-dbmi.org:8443/cox/) provides a proof-of-concept web service that implements a distributed algorithm to conduct distributed survival analysis without sharing patient level data.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsProportional Hazards ModelsSurvival AnalysisComputer Communication NetworksDatasets as TopicDecision Support Systems, ClinicalHumansInformation DisseminationInternetclinical information systemscox modeldecision support systemsdistributed modeling

Identifiers

PMID26159465
PMCPMC5009917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.