Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26159464›Full record

Observational studyJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2016

Overcoming barriers to implementing patient-reported outcomes in an electronic health record: a case report.

Christopher A Harle, Alyson Listhaus, Constanza M Covarrubias, Siegfried Of Schmidt, Sean Mackey, Peter J Carek, Roger B Fillingim, Robert W Hurley

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Piloting Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Cleft Lip and Palate Services in Aotearoa New Zealand.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christopher A HarleDepartment of Health Services Research, Management and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA charle@phhp.ufl.edu.
Alyson ListhausDepartment of Community Health and Family Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Constanza M CovarrubiasDepartment of Health Services Research, Management and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Siegfried Of SchmidtDepartment of Community Health and Family Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Sean MackeyDepartment of Anesthesiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Peter J CarekDepartment of Community Health and Family Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Roger B FillingimDepartment of Community Dentistry and Behavioral Science, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Robert W HurleyDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

Funding

Using social networks to map and evaluate team science across CTSA hubsUL1TR001427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MITCHELL, DUANE A. · 2015 to 2024
$37.2M
University of Florida Older Americans Independence Center (OAIC)P30AG028740 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI CHRISTIAAN LEEUWENBURGH · 2007 to 2026
$22.8M
UF Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000064 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI NELSON, DAVID R · 2012 to 2014
$12.2M
UF Clinical and Translational Science AwardKL2TR000065 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI NELSON, DAVID R · 2012 to 2014
$1.6M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000065NCATS NIH HHS KL2TR000065NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000064NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this case report, the authors describe the implementation of a system for collecting patient-reported outcomes and integrating results in an electronic health record. The objective was to identify lessons learned in overcoming barriers to collecting and integrating patient-reported outcomes in an electronic health record. The authors analyzed qualitative data in 42 documents collected from system development meetings, written feedback from users, and clinical observations with practice staff, providers, and patients. Guided by the Unified Theory on the Adoption and Use of Information Technology, 5 emergent themes were identified. Two barriers emerged: (i) uncertain clinical benefit and (ii) time, work flow, and effort constraints. Three facilitators emerged: (iii) process automation, (iv) usable system interfaces, and (v) collecting patient-reported outcomes for the right patient at the right time. For electronic health record-integrated patient-reported outcomes to succeed as useful clinical tools, system designers must ensure the clinical relevance of the information being collected while minimizing provider, staff, and patient burden.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsPatient Outcome AssessmentChronic PainFamily PracticeHumansOrganizational Case Studiesclinical informaticselectronic health recordpatient outcome assessmentpatient-reported outcomesprimary carework flow

Identifiers

PMID26159464
PMCPMC5009936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.