Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26159120›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of surgery2015

Tube Thoracostomy: A Structured Review of Case Reports and a Standardized Format for Reporting Complications.

Johnathon M Aho, Raaj K Ruparel, Phillip G Rowse, Rushin D Brahmbhatt, Donald Jenkins, Mariela Rivera

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Complications in tube thoracostomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.The journal of trauma and acute care surgery · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Chest Tube Placement and Management: A Practical Review.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2023
    Review
  12. Using cable ties to connect thoracostomy tubes to drainage devices decreases frequency of unplanned disconnection.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2020
    Article
  13. Chest drain and thoracotomy for chest trauma.Journal of thoracic disease · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Tube Thoracostomy Complications Increase Cost.World journal of surgery · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Johnathon M AhoGeneral Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Raaj K RuparelGeneral Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Phillip G RowseGeneral Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Rushin D BrahmbhattGeneral Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Donald JenkinsDivision of Trauma, Critical Care, and General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Mariela RiveraDivision of Trauma, Critical Care, and General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. rivera.mariela@mayo.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough seemingly straightforward, tube thoracostomy (TT) has been associated with complication rates as high as 30 %. A lack of a standardized nomenclature for reporting TT complications makes comparison and evaluation of reports impossible. We aim to develop a classification method in order to standardize the reporting of complications of TT and identify all reported complications of TT and time course in which they occurred to validate the reporting method.

methodsA systematic search of MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Database of Systematic Reviews from each databases inception through November 5, 2013 was conducted. Original articles written in the English language reporting TT complications were searched. This review adhered to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) standards. Duplicate reviewers abstracted case reports for inclusion. Cases were then sorted into one of the five complication categories by two reviewers, and in case of disagreements, settled by a third reviewer.

resultsOf 751 papers reporting TT complications, 124 case reports were included for analysis. From these reports, five main categories of TT complications were identified: insertional (n = 65); positional (n = 36); removal (n = 11); infective and immunologic (n = 7); and instructional, educational, or equipment related (n = 5). Placement of TT has occurred in nearly every soft tissue and vascular structure in the thoracic cavity and intra-abdominal organs.

conclusionOur classification method provides further clarity and systematic standardization for reporting TT complications.

Indexed as

Chest TubesDevice RemovalEquipment FailureHumansPostoperative ComplicationsResearch DesignTerminology as TopicThoracostomy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.