Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26159058›Full record

Trial reportJournal of biomechanics2016

Intensity and generalization of treadmill slip training: High or low, progressive increase or decrease?

Xuan Liu, Tanvi Bhatt, Yi-Chung Clive Pai

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of biomechanics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Dose-response relationship of treadmill perturbation-based balance training for improving reactive balance in older adults at risk of falling: results of the FEATURE randomized controlled pilot trial.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xuan LiuDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Tanvi BhattDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Yi-Chung Clive PaiDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA. Electronic address: cpai@uic.edu.

Funding

MOTOR TRAINING FOR FALL PREVENTION: ADAPTATION AND RETENTION IN OLDER ADULTSR01AG029616 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI PAI, YI-CHUNG CLIVE · 2008 to 2012
$1.6M
PERTURBATION TRAINING FOR FALL-RISK REDUCTION AMONG OLDER ADULTSR01AG044364 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI BHATT, TANVI · 2013 to 2018
$1.5M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG029616NIA NIH HHS R01-AG029616NIA NIH HHS R01 AG044364NIA NIH HHS R01-AG044364
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of different treadmill slip training protocols on the transfer of reactive and proactive control of center of mass stability to a novel, over-ground slip. Four training protocols were investigated: high-intensity (HI; acceleration of all treadmill slips=12m/s(2)), low-intensity (LO; acceleration of all treadmill slips=6m/s(2)), progressively increasing intensity (INCR; acceleration of treadmill slips increasing from 6m/s(2) to 12m/s(2) over the course of training), and progressively decreasing intensity (DECR; acceleration of treadmill slips decreasing from 12m/s(2) to 6m/s(2) over the course of training). From a pool of 36 young subjects, nine were randomly assigned to each training protocol (HI, LO, INCR, and DECR). In each protocol, subjects underwent a series of 24 treadmill slips before they experienced a novel slip during over-ground walking. Measures from these subjects were compared across groups and to data from control subjects (CTRL, n=9) who had experienced a novel over-ground slip without treadmill training as part of a previous experiment. The results showed that treadmill slip training improved balance control on over-ground slip and had a larger effect on subjects׳ reactive control of stability (44.3%) than on proactive control (27.1%) in comparison with the CTRL group. HI yielded stronger generalization than LO, while INCR was only marginally better than DECR. Finally, the group means of stability displayed a clear ascending order from CTRL, LO, DECR, INCR, to HI.

Indexed as

AccelerationAccidental FallsAdaptation, PhysiologicalAdultFemaleHumansMaleWalkingYoung AdultGeneralizationMotor learningPerturbationProactiveReactiveStability

Identifiers

PMID26159058
PMCPMC4691437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.