Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26158873›Full record

ArticleNature communications2015

Gap geometry dictates epithelial closure efficiency.

Andrea Ravasio, Ibrahim Cheddadi, Tianchi Chen, Telmo Pereira, Hui Ting Ong, Cristina Bertocchi, Agusti Brugues, Antonio Jacinto, Alexandre J Kabla, Yusuke Toyama and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Physical models of embryonic epithelial healing.PLoS computational biology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Andrea RavasioMechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117411, Singapore.
Ibrahim CheddadiSorbonne Universités, UPMC University Paris 06, CNRS UMR 7598, Laboratoire Jacques-Louis Lions, F-75252 Paris, France.
Tianchi ChenMechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117411, Singapore.
Telmo PereiraCEDOC - Chronic Diseases Research Center, NOVA Medical School, Rua Camara Pestana, 6, Lisbon, 1150-082 Lisbon, Portugal.
Hui Ting OngMechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117411, Singapore.
Cristina BertocchiMechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117411, Singapore.
Agusti BruguesICREA at Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia and Universitat de Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
Antonio JacintoCEDOC - Chronic Diseases Research Center, NOVA Medical School, Rua Camara Pestana, 6, Lisbon, 1150-082 Lisbon, Portugal.
Alexandre J KablaDepartment of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK.
Yusuke ToyamaMechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117411, Singapore.
Xavier TrepatICREA at Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia and Universitat de Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
Nir GovWeizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel.
Luís Neves de AlmeidaSorbonne Universités, UPMC University Paris 06, CNRS UMR 7598, Laboratoire Jacques-Louis Lions, F-75252 Paris, France.
Benoit LadouxMechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117411, Singapore.

Funding

European Research Council 617233
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Closure of wounds and gaps in tissues is fundamental for the correct development and physiology of multicellular organisms and, when misregulated, may lead to inflammation and tumorigenesis. To re-establish tissue integrity, epithelial cells exhibit coordinated motion into the void by active crawling on the substrate and by constricting a supracellular actomyosin cable. Coexistence of these two mechanisms strongly depends on the environment. However, the nature of their coupling remains elusive because of the complexity of the overall process. Here we demonstrate that epithelial gap geometry in both in vitro and in vivo regulates these collective mechanisms. In addition, the mechanical coupling between actomyosin cable contraction and cell crawling acts as a large-scale regulator to control the dynamics of gap closure. Finally, our computational modelling clarifies the respective roles of the two mechanisms during this process, providing a robust and universal mechanism to explain how epithelial tissues restore their integrity.

Indexed as

ActomyosinAnimalsCell MovementComputer SimulationDogsDrosophila melanogasterEpithelial CellsEpitheliumFluorescent Antibody TechniqueIntravital MicroscopyIn Vitro TechniquesLaser TherapyMadin Darby Canine Kidney CellsMicrosurgeryWound HealingActomyosin

Identifiers

PMID26158873
PMCPMC4510701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.