Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26158728›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2015

Heterogeneous Network Edge Prediction: A Data Integration Approach to Prioritize Disease-Associated Genes.

Daniel S Himmelstein, Sergio E Baranzini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. IMF-DDI: Information Mapping and Fusion Framework for Drug-drug Interaction Prediction.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. From Computational Prediction toResearch square · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Leveraging Artificial Intelligence and Large Language Models for Cancer Immunotherapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. A change language for ontologies and knowledge graphs.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Morphometric Similarity Patterning of Amyloid-International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daniel S HimmelsteinBiological & Medical Informatics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Sergio E BaranziniBiological & Medical Informatics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America; Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America; Institute for Human Genetics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.

Funding

BMI Bioinformatics Training GrantsT32GM067547 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HERNANDEZ, RYAN D. · 2003 to 2022
$6.6M
Integrative Program in Complex Biological System (ipCBS)T32EB009383 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MARSHALL, WALLACE, WEINER, ORION D · 2009 to 2022
$3.2M
Post GWAS approach to identify cell-specific genetic pathways underlying MS riskR01NS088155 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BARANZINI, SERGIO E · 2014 to 2018
$2.2M
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB009383NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM067547NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS088155
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The first decade of Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS) has uncovered a wealth of disease-associated variants. Two important derivations will be the translation of this information into a multiscale understanding of pathogenic variants and leveraging existing data to increase the power of existing and future studies through prioritization. We explore edge prediction on heterogeneous networks--graphs with multiple node and edge types--for accomplishing both tasks. First we constructed a network with 18 node types--genes, diseases, tissues, pathophysiologies, and 14 MSigDB (molecular signatures database) collections--and 19 edge types from high-throughput publicly-available resources. From this network composed of 40,343 nodes and 1,608,168 edges, we extracted features that describe the topology between specific genes and diseases. Next, we trained a model from GWAS associations and predicted the probability of association between each protein-coding gene and each of 29 well-studied complex diseases. The model, which achieved 132-fold enrichment in precision at 10% recall, outperformed any individual domain, highlighting the benefit of integrative approaches. We identified pleiotropy, transcriptional signatures of perturbations, pathways, and protein interactions as influential mechanisms explaining pathogenesis. Our method successfully predicted the results (with AUROC = 0.79) from a withheld multiple sclerosis (MS) GWAS despite starting with only 13 previously associated genes. Finally, we combined our network predictions with statistical evidence of association to propose four novel MS genes, three of which (JAK2, REL, RUNX3) validated on the masked GWAS. Furthermore, our predictions provide biological support highlighting REL as the causal gene within its gene-rich locus. Users can browse all predictions online (http://het.io). Heterogeneous network edge prediction effectively prioritized genetic associations and provides a powerful new approach for data integration across multiple domains.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticAlgorithmsAnimalsChromosome MappingData MiningGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansProtein Interaction MappingProteomeSignal TransductionSystems IntegrationProteome

Identifiers

PMID26158728
PMCPMC4497619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.