Trial reportHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2015
Optimal vaccination program for healthy adults in China.
Trial report in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors influencing immunologic response to hepatitis B vaccine in adults.Scientific reports · 2016Pooled it
- Vaccination Schedule and Age Influence Impaired Responsiveness to Hepatitis B Vaccination: A Randomized Trial in Central Asia.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Trial
- Timing of primary three-dose hepatitis B vaccination and postvaccination serologic testing among a large cohort of healthy adults.Journal of medical virology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is still no suitable routine hepatitis B immunization strategy for adults in China. To establish an optimal vaccination schedule for healthy adults, we investigated various schedules in healthy adults. In this randomized 5143 healthy adults received 10 μg hepatitis B vaccine at 0, 1 and 3 months(group A), 0, 1 and 6 months(group B), or 0, 1 and 12 months(group C). Blood samples were collected after 1 month and 12 months after the third dose. The geometric mean titer (GMT), seroconversion rate (levels of anti-HBs ≥ 10 mIU/mL) and high response rate (levels of anti-HBs ≥ 100 mIU/mL) were assayed. In our study, 2438 healthy adults finished the full vaccination program and follow-up. The seroconversion/sero-protective rate of groups A-C at one and 12 month after administration of the third vaccine dose was 100%, 99.9% and 97.9% verse 64.9%, 75.7% and 79.0%, respectively. GMT for anti-HBs tested in group A to C within 1 or 12 month after the third vaccination was 213.16, 432.58 and 451.47 mIU/ml verse 22.07, 46.70 and 56.18 mIU/ml, respectively. There were significant differences of seroconversion/sero-protective rate and GMT among the 3 groups (p < 0.01). Given the high anti-HBs seroconversion rate and GMT in all 3 groups, a flexible schedule for Hepatitis B vaccine should be recommended to adults, but 0-1-12 schedule is a better choice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.