ArticleScientific reports2015
Computing Arm Movements with a Monkey Brainet.
Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decentralising the Self - Ethical Considerations in Utilizing Decentralised Web Technology for Direct Brain Interfaces.Science and engineering ethics · 2024Article
- When Two Become One: Singular Duos and the Neuroethical Frontiers of Brain-to-Brain Interfaces.Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees · 2024Article
- Approaches of wearable and implantable biosensor towards of developing in precision medicine.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- Direct Comparison of Epifluorescence and Immunostaining for Assessing Viral Mediated Gene Expression in the Primate Brain.Human gene therapy · 2023Article
- Merging Minds: The Conceptual and Ethical Impacts of Emerging Technologies for Collective Minds.Neuroethics · 2023Article
- An optical brain-to-brain interface supports rapid information transmission for precise locomotion control.Science China. Life sciences · 2020Article
- Human enhancement through the lens of experimental and speculative neurotechnologies.Human behavior and emerging technologies · 2019Article
- BrainNet: A Multi-Person Brain-to-Brain Interface for Direct Collaboration Between Brains.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Multi-Person Brain-To-Brain Interfaces: Ethical Issues.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Article
- Human Brain/Cloud Interface.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Article
- Computational neuroscience and neuroinformatics: Recent progress and resources.Journal of biosciences · 2018Review
- Interbrain cortical synchronization encodes multiple aspects of social interactions in monkey pairs.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Development of an Activity-Dependent Epidural Stimulation System in Freely Moving Spinal Cord Injured Rats: A Proof of Concept Study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2018Article
- Article
- Cortical neurons multiplex reward-related signals along with sensory and motor information.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Article
- Interfacing to the brain's motor decisions.Journal of neurophysiology · 2017Review
- Efficient implementation of a real-time estimation system for thalamocortical hidden Parkinsonian properties.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Neuronal Assemblies Evidence Distributed Interactions within a Tactile Discrimination Task in Rats.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2017Article
- The Hypothesis of Connecting Two Spinal Cords as a Way of Sharing Information between Two Brains and Nervous Systems.Frontiers in psychology · 2017Article
- An automatic experimental apparatus to study arm reaching in New World monkeys.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditionally, brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) extract motor commands from a single brain to control the movements of artificial devices. Here, we introduce a Brainet that utilizes very-large-scale brain activity (VLSBA) from two (B2) or three (B3) nonhuman primates to engage in a common motor behaviour. A B2 generated 2D movements of an avatar arm where each monkey contributed equally to X and Y coordinates; or one monkey fully controlled the X-coordinate and the other controlled the Y-coordinate. A B3 produced arm movements in 3D space, while each monkey generated movements in 2D subspaces (X-Y, Y-Z, or X-Z). With long-term training we observed increased coordination of behavior, increased correlations in neuronal activity between different brains, and modifications to neuronal representation of the motor plan. Overall, performance of the Brainet improved owing to collective monkey behaviour. These results suggest that primate brains can be integrated into a Brainet, which self-adapts to achieve a common motor goal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.