Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26158453›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Sero-Prevalence of Rodent Pathogens in India.

Shrruthi Manjunath, Prachet G Kulkarni, Krishnaveni Nagavelu, Rosa J Samuel, Sandhya Srinivasan, Nandhini Ramasamy, Nagendra R Hegde, Ramachandra S Gudde

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Health Monitoring of Laboratory Rodent Colonies-Talking about (R)evolution.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shrruthi ManjunathCentral Animal Facility, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India.
Prachet G KulkarniCentral Animal Facility, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India.
Krishnaveni NagaveluCentral Animal Facility, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India.
Rosa J SamuelCentral Animal Facility, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India.
Sandhya SrinivasanCentral Animal Facility, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India.
Nandhini RamasamyElla Foundation, Genome Valley, Turkapally, Shameerpet Mandal, Hyderabad, India.
Nagendra R HegdeElla Foundation, Genome Valley, Turkapally, Shameerpet Mandal, Hyderabad, India.
Ramachandra S GuddeCentral Animal Facility, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India.
Indian Institute of Science Bangalore · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health monitoring is an integral part of laboratory animal quality standards. However, current or past prevalence data as well as regulatory requirements dictate the frequency, type and the expanse of health monitoring. In an effort to understand the prevalence of rodent pathogens in India, a preliminary study was carried out by sero-epidemiology. Sera samples obtained from 26 public and private animal facilities were analyzed for the presence of antibodies against minute virus of mice (MVM), ectromelia virus (ECTV), lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV), mouse hepatitis virus (MHV), Sendai virus (SeV), and Mycoplasma pulmonis in mice, and SeV, rat parvo virus (RPV), Kilham's rat virus (KRV) and sialodacryoadenitis virus (SDAV) in rats, by sandwich ELISA. It was observed that MHV was the most prevalent agent followed by Mycoplasma pulmonis and MVM in mice, and SDAV followed by RPV were prevalent in rats. On the other hand, none of the samples were positive for ECTV in mice, or SeV or KRV in rats. Multiple infections were common in both mice and rats. The incidence of MHV and Mycoplasma pulmonis was higher in facilities maintained by public organizations than in vivaria of private organizations, although the difference was not statistically different. On the other hand the prevalence of rodent pathogens was significantly higher in the northern part of India than in the South. These studies form the groundwork for detailed sero-prevalence studies which should further lay the foundations for country-specific guidelines for health monitoring of laboratory animals.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, LaboratoryAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, ViralEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayGeographyIncidenceIndiaMiceMycoplasma InfectionsMycoplasma pulmonisPrevalenceRatsRodent DiseasesSeroepidemiologic StudiesVirus DiseasesAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, Viral

Identifiers

PMID26158453
PMCPMC4497729
OpenAlexW1820735544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.