Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26158274›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2015

Evaluating Spatial Interaction Models for Regional Mobility in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Amy Wesolowski, Wendy Prudhomme O'Meara, Nathan Eagle, Andrew J Tatem, Caroline O Buckee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Measurement of urban vitality with time-lapsed street-view images and object-detection for scalable assessment of pedestrian-sidewalk dynamics.ISPRS journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing : official publication of the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ISPRS) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Comparing metapopulation dynamics of infectious diseases under different models of human movement.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amy WesolowskiDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America; Center for Communicable Disease Dynamics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Wendy Prudhomme O'MearaDepartment of Medicine, Duke University and Duke Global Health Institute, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Nathan EagleDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America; College of Computer and Information Science, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Andrew J TatemDepartment of Geography and Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Caroline O BuckeeDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America; Center for Communicable Disease Dynamics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Funding

Transmission ProjectU19AI089674 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MATTHEW G DORSEY · 2010 to 2026
$29.3M
Understanding and controlling antibiotic resistanceU54GM088558 · NIGMS · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI HANAGE, WILLIAM · 2009 to 2018
$26.4M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI089674NIAID NIH HHS U19AI089674NIGMS NIH HHS 1U54GM088558NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM088558
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Simple spatial interaction models of human mobility based on physical laws have been used extensively in the social, biological, and physical sciences, and in the study of the human dynamics underlying the spread of disease. Recent analyses of commuting patterns and travel behavior in high-income countries have led to the suggestion that these models are highly generalizable, and as a result, gravity and radiation models have become standard tools for describing population mobility dynamics for infectious disease epidemiology. Communities in Sub-Saharan Africa may not conform to these models, however; physical accessibility, availability of transport, and cost of travel between locations may be variable and severely constrained compared to high-income settings, informal labor movements rather than regular commuting patterns are often the norm, and the rise of mega-cities across the continent has important implications for travel between rural and urban areas. Here, we first review how infectious disease frameworks incorporate human mobility on different spatial scales and use anonymous mobile phone data from nearly 15 million individuals to analyze the spatiotemporal dynamics of the Kenyan population. We find that gravity and radiation models fail in systematic ways to capture human mobility measured by mobile phones; both severely overestimate the spatial spread of travel and perform poorly in rural areas, but each exhibits different characteristic patterns of failure with respect to routes and volumes of travel. Thus, infectious disease frameworks that rely on spatial interaction models are likely to misrepresent population dynamics important for the spread of disease in many African populations.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalPopulation DynamicsSpatio-Temporal AnalysisAfrica South of the SaharaCell PhoneComputer SimulationEmploymentHumansTravel

Identifiers

PMID26158274
PMCPMC4497594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.