Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26158271›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2015

Biofilm Formation As a Response to Ecological Competition.

Nuno M Oliveira, Nuno M Oliveria, Esteban Martinez-Garcia, Joao Xavier, William M Durham, Roberto Kolter, Wook Kim, Kevin R Foster

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 147 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
147citing papers in PubMed
15.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

147 citing papers in PubMed, 299 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. BioMed research international · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  14. Orthopaedic infections: novel treatment strategies and evolving concepts.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

87 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Nuno M Oliveira
Nuno M OliveriaDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Oxford Centre for Integrative Systems Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Esteban Martinez-GarciaFAS Center for Systems Biology, University of Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America; Centro Nacional de Biotecnologia-CSIC, Campus de Cantoblanco, Madrid, Spain.
Joao XavierFAS Center for Systems Biology, University of Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Computational Biology Program, New York, New York, United States of America.
William M DurhamDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Roberto KolterHarvard Medical School, Department of Microbiology and Immunobiology, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Wook KimDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Oxford Centre for Integrative Systems Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; FAS Center for Systems Biology, University of Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Kevin R FosterDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Oxford Centre for Integrative Systems Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; FAS Center for Systems Biology, University of Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
University of Oxford · GBCenter for Systems Biology · USHarvard University · US

Funding

MOLECULAR GENETICS OF BIOFILM FORMATIONR01GM058213 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI RUDNER, DAVID Z · 1998 to 2017
$7.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM58213NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM058213
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteria form dense surface-associated communities known as biofilms that are central to their persistence and how they affect us. Biofilm formation is commonly viewed as a cooperative enterprise, where strains and species work together for a common goal. Here we explore an alternative model: biofilm formation is a response to ecological competition. We co-cultured a diverse collection of natural isolates of the opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa and studied the effect on biofilm formation. We show that strain mixing reliably increases biofilm formation compared to unmixed conditions. Importantly, strain mixing leads to strong competition: one strain dominates and largely excludes the other from the biofilm. Furthermore, we show that pyocins, narrow-spectrum antibiotics made by other P. aeruginosa strains, can stimulate biofilm formation by increasing the attachment of cells. Side-by-side comparisons using microfluidic assays suggest that the increase in biofilm occurs due to a general response to cellular damage: a comparable biofilm response occurs for pyocins that disrupt membranes as for commercial antibiotics that damage DNA, inhibit protein synthesis or transcription. Our data show that bacteria increase biofilm formation in response to ecological competition that is detected by antibiotic stress. This is inconsistent with the idea that sub-lethal concentrations of antibiotics are cooperative signals that coordinate microbial communities, as is often concluded. Instead, our work is consistent with competition sensing where low-levels of antibiotics are used to detect and respond to the competing genotypes that produce them.

Indexed as

AntibiosisAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsCoculture TechniquesMicrofluidicsPseudomonas aeruginosaPyocinsAnti-Bacterial AgentsPyocins

Identifiers

PMID26158271
PMCPMC4497666
OpenAlexW2162733558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.