Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26158120›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2015

Assessing the accuracy and reproducibility of modality independent elastography in a murine model of breast cancer.

Jared A Weis, Katelyn M Flint, Violeta Sanchez, Thomas E Yankeelov, Michael I Miga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Translating preclinical MRI methods to clinical oncology.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2019
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mechanotransduction in cancer.Current opinion in chemical engineering · 2016
    Article
  10. MR Imaging Biomarkers in Oncology Clinical Trials.Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jared A WeisVanderbilt University , Department of Biomedical Engineering, PMB 351631, 2301 Vanderbilt Place, Nashville, Tennessee 37235-1631, United States ; Vanderbilt University , Institute of Imaging Science, 1161 21st Avenue South, AA-1105 MCN, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2310, United States ; Vanderbilt University , Radiology and Radiological Sciences, 1161 21st Avenue South, MCN CCC-1118, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2675, United States.
Katelyn M FlintVanderbilt University , Department of Biomedical Engineering, PMB 351631, 2301 Vanderbilt Place, Nashville, Tennessee 37235-1631, United States.
Violeta SanchezVanderbilt University , Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, 2220 Pierce Avenue, 691 PRB, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-6838, United States.
Thomas E YankeelovVanderbilt University , Department of Biomedical Engineering, PMB 351631, 2301 Vanderbilt Place, Nashville, Tennessee 37235-1631, United States ; Vanderbilt University , Institute of Imaging Science, 1161 21st Avenue South, AA-1105 MCN, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2310, United States ; Vanderbilt University , Radiology and Radiological Sciences, 1161 21st Avenue South, MCN CCC-1118, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2675, United States ; Vanderbilt University , Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, 2220 Pierce Avenue, 691 PRB, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-6838, United States ; Vanderbilt University , Physics and Astronomy, PMB 401807, 2301 Vanderbilt Place, Nashville, Tennessee 37240-1807, United States ; Vanderbilt University , Cancer Biology, 2220 Pierce Avenue, 771 PRB, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-6840, United States.
Michael I MigaVanderbilt University , Department of Biomedical Engineering, PMB 351631, 2301 Vanderbilt Place, Nashville, Tennessee 37235-1631, United States ; Vanderbilt University , Institute of Imaging Science, 1161 21st Avenue South, AA-1105 MCN, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2310, United States ; Vanderbilt University , Radiology and Radiological Sciences, 1161 21st Avenue South, MCN CCC-1118, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2675, United States ; Vanderbilt University , Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, 2220 Pierce Avenue, 691 PRB, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-6838, United States ; Vanderbilt University , Neurosurgery, T-4224 MCN Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2380, United States.

Funding

Multidisciplinary Training in Basic and Translational Imaging of CancerR25CA092043 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MANNING, HENRY CHARLES · 2001 to 2015
$6.6M
Quantitative MRI for Predicting Response of Breast Cancer to Neoadjuvant TherapyU01CA142565 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI KARCZMAR, GREGORY S., NANDA, RITA · 2010 to 2019
$4.5M
Image Driven Multi-Scale Modeling to Predict Treatment Response in Breast CancerU01CA174706 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI QUARANTA, VITO, YANKEELOV, THOMAS E · 2013 to 2018
$2.5M
Evaluation and Validation of Imaging Biomarkers of Tumor Response to TreatmentR01CA138599 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MCINTYRE, JAMES OLIVER · 2010 to 2015
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA138599NCI NIH HHS R25 CA092043NCI NIH HHS U01 CA142565NCI NIH HHS U01 CA174706
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer progression has been linked to mechanics. Therefore, there has been recent interest in developing noninvasive imaging tools for cancer assessment that are sensitive to changes in tissue mechanical properties. We have developed one such method, modality independent elastography (MIE), that estimates the relative elastic properties of tissue by fitting anatomical image volumes acquired before and after the application of compression to biomechanical models. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy and reproducibility of the method using phantoms and a murine breast cancer model. Magnetic resonance imaging data were acquired, and the MIE method was used to estimate relative volumetric stiffness. Accuracy was assessed using phantom data by comparing to gold-standard mechanical testing of elasticity ratios. Validation error was [Formula: see text]. Reproducibility analysis was performed on animal data, and within-subject coefficients of variation ranged from 2 to 13% at the bulk level and 32% at the voxel level. To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the reproducibility of an elasticity imaging metric in a preclinical cancer model. Our results suggest that the MIE method can reproducibly generate accurate estimates of the relative mechanical stiffness and provide guidance on the degree of change needed in order to declare biological changes rather than experimental error in future therapeutic studies.

Indexed as

breast cancercomputational modelingelastographymagnetic resonance imagingmechanical properties

Identifiers

PMID26158120
PMCPMC4490672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.