Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26158068›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2014

Segmenting pectoralis muscle on digital mammograms by a Markov random field-maximum a posteriori model.

Mei Ge, James G Mainprize, Gordon E Mawdsley, Martin J Yaffe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mei GeSunnybrook Research Institute , Department of Physical Sciences, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada.
James G MainprizeSunnybrook Research Institute , Department of Physical Sciences, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada.
Gordon E MawdsleySunnybrook Research Institute , Department of Physical Sciences, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada.
Martin J YaffeSunnybrook Research Institute , Department of Physical Sciences, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada ; University of Toronto , Department of Medical Biophysics, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1L7, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate and automatic segmentation of the pectoralis muscle is essential in many breast image processing procedures, for example, in the computation of volumetric breast density from digital mammograms. Its segmentation is a difficult task due to the heterogeneity of the region, neighborhood complexities, and shape variability. The segmentation is achieved by pixel classification through a Markov random field (MRF) image model. Using the image intensity feature as observable data and local spatial information as a priori, the posterior distribution is estimated in a stochastic process. With a variable potential component in the energy function, by the maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimate of the labeling image, given the image intensity feature which is assumed to follow a Gaussian distribution, we achieved convergence properties in an appropriate sense by Metropolis sampling the posterior distribution of the selected energy function. By proposing an adjustable spatial constraint, the MRF-MAP model is able to embody the shape requirement and provide the required flexibility for the model parameter fitting process. We demonstrate that accurate and robust segmentation can be achieved for the curving-triangle-shaped pectoralis muscle in the medio-lateral-oblique (MLO) view, and the semielliptic-shaped muscle in cranio-caudal (CC) view digital mammograms. The applicable mammograms can be either "For Processing" or "For Presentation" image formats. The algorithm was developed using 56 MLO-view and 79 CC-view FFDM "For Processing" images, and quantitatively evaluated against a random selection of 122 MLO-view and 173 CC-view FFDM images of both presentation intent types.

Indexed as

digital mammogramGibbs distributionMarkov random fieldmaximum a posteriori estimateMetropolis samplingpectoralis musclesegmentationvariable spatial constraint

Identifiers

PMID26158068
PMCPMC4478980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.